\chapter{Some topological constructions} In this short chapter we briefly describe some common spaces and constructions in topology that we haven't yet discussed. \section{Spheres} Recall that \[ S^n = \left\{ (x_0, \dots, x_n) \mid x_0^2 + \dots + x_n^2 = 1 \right\} \subset \RR^{n+1} \] is the surface of an $n$-sphere while \[ D^{n+1} = \left\{ (x_0, \dots, x_n) \mid x_0^2 + \dots + x_n^2 \le 1 \right\} \subset \RR^{n+1} \] is the corresponding \emph{closed ball} (So for example, $D^2$ is a disk in a plane while $S^1$ is the unit circle.) \begin{exercise} Show that the open ball $D^n \setminus S^{n-1}$ is homeomorphic to $\RR^n$. \end{exercise} In particular, $S^0$ consists of two points, while $D^1$ can be thought of as the interval $[-1,1]$. \begin{center} \begin{asy} size(8cm); draw(dir(0)--dir(180), blue); dot(dir(0), red+4); dot(dir(180), red+4); label("$S^0$", dir(0), dir(90), red); label("$D^1$", dir(0)--dir(180), blue); add(shift(-4,0)*CC()); unitsize(2cm); filldraw(unitcircle, lightblue+opacity(0.2), red); label("$D^2$", origin, blue); label("$S^1$", dir(45), dir(45), red); \end{asy} \end{center} \section{Quotient topology} \prototype{$D^n / S^{n-1} = S^n$, or the torus.} Given a space $X$, we can \emph{identify} some of the points together by any equivalence relation $\sim$; for an $x \in X$ we denote its equivalence class by $[x]$. Geometrically, this is the space achieved by welding together points equivalent under $\sim$. Formally, \begin{definition} Let $X$ be a topological space, and $\sim$ an equivalence relation on the points of $X$. Then $X / {\sim}$ is the space whose \begin{itemize} \ii Points are equivalence classes of $X$, and \ii $U \subseteq X / {\sim}$ is open if and only if $\left\{ x \in X \text{ such that } [x] \in U \right\}$ is open in $X$. \end{itemize} \end{definition} As far as I can tell, this definition is mostly useless for intuition, so here are some examples. \begin{example}[Interval modulo endpoints] Suppose we take $D^1 = [-1, 1]$ and quotient by the equivalence relation which identifies the endpoints $-1$ and $1$. (Formally, $x \sim y \iff (x=y) \text{ or } \{x,y\} = \{-1,1\}$.) In that case, we simply recover $S^1$: \begin{center} \begin{asy} size(8cm); draw(dir(0)--dir(180), blue); dot("$-1$", dir(0), dir(90), red+4); dot("$-1$", dir(180), dir(90), red+4); label("$D^1$", dir(0)--dir(180), blue); add(shift(-4,0)*CC()); unitsize(2cm); draw(unitcircle, blue); label("$S^1 \approx D^1 / {\sim}$", dir(45), dir(45), blue); dot("$-1 \sim 1$", dir(90), dir(90), red); \end{asy} \end{center} Observe that a small open neighborhood around $-1 \sim 1$ in the quotient space corresponds to two half-intervals at $-1$ and $1$ in the original space $D^1$. This should convince you the definition we gave is the right one. \end{example} \begin{example}[More quotient spaces] Convince yourself that: \begin{itemize} \ii Generalizing the previous example, $D^n$ modulo its boundary $S^{n-1}$ is $S^n$. \ii Given a square $ABCD$, suppose we identify segments $AB$ and $DC$ together. Then we get a cylinder. (Think elementary school, when you would tape up pieces of paper together to get cylinders.) \ii In the previous example, if we also identify $BC$ and $DA$ together, then we get a torus. (Imagine taking our cylinder and putting the two circles at the end together.) \ii Let $X = \RR$, and let $x \sim y$ if $y -x \in \ZZ$. Then $X / {\sim}$ is $S^1$ as well. \end{itemize} \end{example} One special case that we did above: \begin{definition} Let $A \subseteq X$. Consider the equivalence relation which identifies all the points of $A$ with each other while leaving all remaining points inequivalent. (In other words, $x \sim y$ if $x=y$ or $x,y \in A$.) Then the resulting quotient space is denoted $X/A$. \end{definition} So in this notation, \[ D^n / S^{n-1} = S^n. \] \begin{abuse} Note that I'm deliberately being sloppy, and saying ``$D^n / S^{n-1} = S^n$'' or ``$D^n / S^{n-1}$ \emph{is} $S^n$'', when I really ought to say ``$D^n / S^{n-1}$ is homeomorphic to $S^n$''. This is a general theme in mathematics: objects which are homoeomorphic/isomorphic/etc.\ are generally not carefully distinguished from each other. \end{abuse} \section{Product topology} \prototype{$\RR \times \RR$ is $\RR^2$, $S^1 \times S^1$ is the torus.} \begin{definition} Given topological spaces $X$ and $Y$, the \vocab{product topology} on $X \times Y$ is the space whose \begin{itemize} \ii Points are pairs $(x,y)$ with $x \in X$, $y \in Y$, and \ii Topology is given as follows: the \emph{basis} of the topology for $X \times Y$ is $U \times V$, for $U \subseteq X$ open and $V \subseteq Y$ open. \end{itemize} \end{definition} \begin{remark} It is not hard to show that, in fact, one need only consider basis elements for $U$ and $V$. That is to say, \[ \left\{ U \times V \mid U,V \text{ basis elements for } X,Y \right\} \] is also a basis for $X \times Y$. We really do need to fiddle with the basis: in $\RR \times \RR$, an open unit disk better be open, despite not being of the form $U \times V$. \end{remark} This does exactly what you think it would. \begin{example}[The unit square] Let $X = [0,1]$ and consider $X \times X$. We of course expect this to be the unit square. Pictured below is an open set of $X \times X$ in the basis. \begin{center} \begin{asy} size(6cm); filldraw(unitsquare, opacity(0.2)+lightblue, black); pair B = (0,1); pair A = (1,0); fill(box(0.3*A+0.2*B,0.6*A+0.7*B), lightred+opacity(0.5)); label("$U \times V$", (0.45,0.45), brown); draw(0.3*A--(0.3*A+B), heavygreen+dashed+1); draw(0.6*A--(0.6*A+B), heavygreen+dashed+1); draw(0.2*B--(0.2*B+A), heavycyan+dashed+1); draw(0.7*B--(0.7*B+A), heavycyan+dashed+1); draw( 0.3*A--0.6*A, heavygreen+2 ); opendot( 0.3*A, heavygreen+2); opendot( 0.6*A, heavygreen+2); label("$U$", 0.45*A, dir(-90), heavygreen); draw( 0.2*B--0.7*B, heavycyan+2 ); opendot( 0.2*B, heavycyan+2); opendot( 0.7*B, heavycyan+2); label("$V$", 0.45*B, dir(180), heavycyan); \end{asy} \end{center} \end{example} \begin{exercise} Convince yourself this basis gives the same topology as the product metric on $X \times X$. So this is the ``right'' definition. \end{exercise} \begin{example}[More product spaces] \listhack \begin{enumerate}[(a)] \ii $\RR \times \RR$ is the Euclidean plane. \ii $S^1 \times [0,1]$ is a cylinder. \ii $S^1 \times S^1$ is a torus! (Why?) \end{enumerate} \end{example} \section{Disjoint union and wedge sum} \prototype{$S^1 \vee S^1$ is the figure eight.} The disjoint union of two spaces is geometrically exactly what it sounds like: you just imagine the two spaces side by side. For completeness, here is the formal definition. \begin{definition} Let $X$ and $Y$ be two topological spaces. The \vocab{disjoint union}, denoted $X \amalg Y$, is defined by \begin{itemize} \ii The points are the disjoint union $X \amalg Y$, and \ii A subset $U \subseteq X \amalg Y$ is open if and only if $U \cap X$ and $U \cap Y$ are open. \end{itemize} \end{definition} \begin{exercise} Show that the disjoint union of two nonempty spaces is disconnected. \end{exercise} More interesting is the wedge sum, where two topological spaces $X$ and $Y$ are fused together only at a single base point. \begin{definition} Let $X$ and $Y$ be topological spaces, and $x_0 \in X$ and $y_0 \in Y$ be points. We define the equivalence relation $\sim$ by declaring $x_0 \sim y_0$ only. Then the \vocab{wedge sum} of two spaces is defined as \[ X \vee Y = (X \amalg Y) / {\sim}. \] \end{definition} \begin{example} [$S^1 \vee S^1$ is a figure eight] Let $X = S^1$ and $Y = S^1$, and let $x_0 \in X$ and $y_0 \in Y$ be any points. Then $X \vee Y$ is a ``figure eight'': it is two circles fused together at one point. \begin{center} \begin{asy} size(3cm); draw(shift(-1,0)*unitcircle); draw(shift(1,0)*unitcircle); dotfactor *= 1.4; dot(origin); \end{asy} \end{center} \end{example} \begin{abuse} We often don't mention $x_0$ and $y_0$ when they are understood (or irrelevant). For example, from now on we will just write $S^1 \vee S^1$ for a figure eight. \end{abuse} \begin{remark} Annoyingly, in \LaTeX\ \verb+\wedge+ gives $\wedge$ instead of $\vee$ (which is \verb+\vee+). So this really should be called the ``vee product'', but too late. \end{remark} \section{CW complexes} Using this construction, we can start building some spaces. One common way to do so is using a so-called \vocab{CW complex}. Intuitively, a CW complex is built as follows: \begin{itemize} \ii Start with a set of points $X^0$. \ii Define $X^1$ by taking some line segments (copies of $D^1$) and fusing the endpoints (copies of $S^0$) onto $X^0$. \ii Define $X^2$ by taking copies of $D^2$ (a disk) and welding its boundary (a copy of $S^1$) onto $X^1$. \ii Repeat inductively up until a finite stage $n$; we say $X$ is \vocab{$n$-dimensional}. \end{itemize} The resulting space $X$ is the CW-complex. The set $X^k$ is called the \vocab{$k$-skeleton} of $X$. Each $D^k$ is called a \vocab{$k$-cell}; it is customary to denote it by $e_\alpha^k$ where $\alpha$ is some index. We say that $X$ is \vocab{finite} if only finitely many cells were used. \begin{abuse} Technically, most sources (like \cite{ref:hatcher}) allow one to construct infinite-dimensional CW complexes. We will not encounter any such spaces in the Napkin. \end{abuse} \begin{example} [$D^2$ with $2+2+1$ and $1+1+1$ cells] \listhack \begin{enumerate}[(a)] \ii First, we start with $X^0$ having two points $e_a^0$ and $e_b^0$. Then, we join them with two $1$-cells $D^1$ (green), call them $e_c^1$ and $e_d^1$. The endpoints of each $1$-cell (the copy of $S^0$) get identified with distinct points of $X^0$; hence $X^1 \cong S^1$. Finally, we take a single $2$-cell $e^2$ (yellow) and weld it in, with its boundary fitting into the copy of $S^1$ that we just drew. This gives the figure on the left. \ii In fact, one can do this using just $1+1+1=3$ cells. Start with $X^0$ having a single point $e^0$. Then, use a single $1$-cell $e^1$, fusing its two endpoints into the single point of $X^0$. Then, one can fit in a copy of $S^1$ as before, giving $D^2$ as on the right. \end{enumerate} \begin{center} \begin{asy} size(4cm); filldraw(unitcircle, opacity(0.2)+yellow, heavygreen); dotfactor *= 1.4; dot(dir(90), blue); dot(dir(-90), blue); label("$e_a^0$", dir(90), dir(90), blue); label("$e_b^0$", dir(-90), dir(-90), blue); label("$e_c^1$", dir(0), dir(0), heavygreen); label("$e_d^1$", dir(180), dir(180), heavygreen); label("$e^2$", origin, origin); \end{asy} \qquad \begin{asy} size(4cm); filldraw(unitcircle, opacity(0.2)+yellow, heavygreen); dotfactor *= 1.4; dot(dir(90), blue); label("$e^0$", dir(90), dir(90), blue); label("$e^1$", dir(-90), dir(-90), heavygreen); label("$e^2$", origin, origin); \end{asy} \end{center} \end{example} \begin{example} [$S^n$ as a CW complex] \listhack \begin{enumerate}[(a)] \ii One can obtain $S^n$ (for $n \ge 1$) with just two cells. Namely, take a single point $e^0$ for $X^0$, and to obtain $S^n$ take $D^n$ and weld its entire boundary into $e^0$. We already saw this example in the beginning with $n=2$, when we saw that the sphere $S^2$ was the result when we fuse the boundary of a disk $D^2$ together. \ii Alternatively, one can do a ``hemisphere'' construction, by constructing $S^n$ inductively using two cells in each dimension. So $S^0$ consists of two points, then $S^1$ is obtained by joining these two points by two segments ($1$-cells), and $S^2$ is obtained by gluing two hemispheres (each a $2$-cell) with $S^1$ as its equator. \end{enumerate} \end{example} \begin{definition} Formally, for each $k$-cell $e^k_\alpha$ we want to add to $X^k$, we take its boundary $S^{k-1}_\alpha$ and weld it onto $X^{k-1}$ via an \vocab{attaching map} $S^{k-1}_\alpha \to X^{k-1}$. Then \[ X^k = X^{k-1} \amalg \left(\coprod_\alpha e^k_\alpha\right) / {\sim} \] where $\sim$ identifies each boundary point of $e^k_\alpha$ with its image in $X^{k-1}$. \end{definition} \section{The torus, Klein bottle, $\RP^n$, $\CP^n$} \label{sec:top_spaces} We now present four of the most important examples of CW complexes. \subsection{The torus} The \vocab{torus} can be formed by taking a square and identifying the opposite edges in the same direction: if you walk off the right edge, you re-appear at the corresponding point in on the left edge. (Think \emph{Asteroids} from Atari!) \begin{center} \begin{asy} size(2cm); fill(unitsquare, yellow+opacity(0.2)); pair C = (0,0); pair B = (1,0); pair A = (1,1); pair D = (0,1); draw(A--B, red, MidArrow); draw(B--C, blue, MidArrow); draw(D--C, red, MidArrow); draw(A--D, blue, MidArrow); \end{asy} \end{center} Thus the torus is $(\RR/\ZZ)^2 \cong S^1 \times S^1$. Note that all four corners get identified together to a single point. One can realize the torus in $3$-space by treating the square as a sheet of paper, taping together the left and right (red) edges to form a cylinder, then bending the cylinder and fusing the top and bottom (blue) edges to form the torus. \begin{center} \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{media/Projection_color_torus.jpg} \\ \scriptsize Image from \cite{img:torus} \end{center} The torus can be realized as a CW complex with \begin{itemize} \ii A $0$-skeleton consisting of a single point, \ii A $1$-skeleton consisting of two $1$-cells $e^1_a$, $e^1_b$, and \begin{center} \begin{asy} unitsize(1cm); draw(shift(-1,0)*unitcircle, blue, MidArrow); draw(shift(1,0)*rotate(180)*unitcircle, red, MidArrow); label("$e^1_a$", 2*dir(180), dir(180), blue); label("$e^1_b$", 2*dir(0), dir(0), red); dotfactor *= 1.4; dot("$e^0$", origin, dir(0)); \end{asy} \end{center} \ii A $2$-skeleton with a single $2$-cell $e^2$, whose circumference is divided into four parts, and welded onto the $1$-skeleton ``via $aba\inv b \inv$''. This means: wrap a quarter of the circumference around $e^1_a$, then another quarter around $e^1_b$, then the third quarter around $e^1_a$ but in the opposite direction, and the fourth quarter around $e^1_b$ again in the opposite direction as before. \begin{center} \begin{asy} size(3cm); fill(unitcircle, yellow+opacity(0.2)); defaultpen(linewidth(1)); draw(arc(origin, 1, 45, 135), blue, MidArrow); draw(arc(origin, 1, 315, 225), blue, MidArrow); draw(arc(origin, 1, 135, 225), red, MidArrow); draw(arc(origin, 1, 45, -45), red, MidArrow); label("$e^2$", origin, origin); \end{asy} \end{center} \end{itemize} We say that $aba\inv b\inv$ is the \vocab{attaching word}; this shorthand will be convenient later on. \subsection{The Klein bottle} The \vocab{Klein bottle} is defined similarly to the torus, except one pair of edges is identified in the opposite manner, as shown. \begin{center} \begin{asy} size(2cm); fill(unitsquare, yellow+opacity(0.2)); pair C = (0,0); pair B = (1,0); pair A = (1,1); pair D = (0,1); draw(A--B, red, MidArrow); draw(C--B, blue, MidArrow); draw(D--C, red, MidArrow); draw(A--D, blue, MidArrow); \end{asy} \end{center} Unlike the torus one cannot realize this in $3$-space without self-intersecting. One can tape together the red edges as before to get a cylinder, but to then fuse the resulting blue circles in opposite directions is not possible in 3D. Nevertheless, we often draw a picture in 3-dimensional space in which we tacitly allow the cylinder to intersect itself. \begin{center} \begin{minipage}[c]{0.5\textwidth} \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{media/klein-fold.png} \end{minipage} \quad \begin{minipage}[c]{0.3\textwidth} \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{media/KleinBottle-01.png} \end{minipage} \par \scriptsize Image from \cite{img:kleinfold,img:kleinbottle} \end{center} Like the torus, the Klein bottle is realized as a CW complex with \begin{itemize} \ii One $0$-cell, \ii Two $1$-cells $e^1_a$ and $e^1_b$, and \ii A single $2$-cell attached this time via the word $abab\inv$. \end{itemize} \subsection{Real projective space} Let's start with $n=2$. The space $\RP^2$ is obtained if we reverse both directions of the square from before, as shown. \begin{center} \begin{asy} size(2cm); fill(unitsquare, yellow+opacity(0.2)); pair C = (0,0); pair B = (1,0); pair A = (1,1); pair D = (0,1); draw(B--A, red, MidArrow); draw(C--B, blue, MidArrow); draw(D--C, red, MidArrow); draw(A--D, blue, MidArrow); \end{asy} \end{center} However, once we do this the fact that the original polygon is a square is kind of irrelevant; we can combine a red and blue edge to get the single purple edge. Equivalently, one can think of this as a circle with half its circumference identified with the other half: \begin{center} \begin{asy} size(3cm); dotfactor *= 2; fill(unitcircle, opacity(0.2)+yellow); draw(dir(-90)..dir(0)..dir(90), purple, MidArrow); draw(dir(90)..dir(180)..dir(-90), purple, MidArrow); dot(dir(90)); dot(dir(-90)); label("$\mathbb{RP}^2$", origin, origin); \end{asy} \qquad \begin{asy} size(3cm); dotfactor *= 2; draw(dir(-90)..dir(0)..dir(90)); draw(dir(90)..dir(180)..dir(-90), dashed); fill(unitcircle, yellow+opacity(0.2)); dot(dir(90)); opendot(dir(-90)); label("$\mathbb{RP}^2$", origin, origin); \end{asy} \end{center} The resulting space should be familiar to those of you who do projective (Euclidean) geometry. Indeed, there are several possible geometric interpretations: \begin{itemize} \ii One can think of $\RP^2$ as the set of lines through the origin in $\RR^3$, with each line being a point in $\RP^2$. Of course, we can identify each line with a point on the unit sphere $S^2$, except for the property that two antipodal points actually correspond to the same line, so that $\RP^2$ can be almost thought of as ``half a sphere''. Flattening it gives the picture above. \ii Imagine $\RR^2$, except augmented with ``points at infinity''. This means that we add some points ``infinitely far away'', one for each possible direction of a line. Thus in $\RP^2$, any two lines indeed intersect (at a Euclidean point if they are not parallel, and at a point at infinity if they do). This gives an interpretation of $\RP^2$, where the boundary represents the \emph{line at infinity} through all of the points at infinity. Here we have used the fact that $\RR^2$ and interior of $D^2$ are homeomorphic. \end{itemize} \begin{exercise} Observe that these formulations are equivalent by considering the plane $z=1$ in $\RR^3$, and intersecting each line in the first formulation with this plane. \end{exercise} We can also express $\RP^2$ using coordinates: it is the set of triples $(x : y : z)$ of real numbers not all zero up to scaling, meaning that \[ (x : y : z) = (\lambda x : \lambda y : \lambda z) \] for any $\lambda \neq 0$. Using the ``lines through the origin in $\RR^3$'' interpretation makes it clear why this coordinate system gives the right space. The points at infinity are those with $z = 0$, and any point with $z \neq 0$ gives a Cartesian point since \[ (x : y : z) = \left( \frac xz : \frac yz : 1 \right) \] hence we can think of it as the Cartesian point $(\frac xz, \frac yz)$. In this way we can actually define \vocab{real-projective $n$-space}, $\RP^n$ for any $n$, as either \begin{enumerate}[(i)] \ii The set of lines through the origin in $\RR^{n+1}$, \ii Using $n+1$ coordinates as above, or \ii As $\RR^n$ augmented with points at infinity, which themselves form a copy of $\RP^{n-1}$. \end{enumerate} As a possibly helpful example, we give all three pictures of $\RP^1$. \begin{example} [Real projective $1$-Space] $\RP^1$ can be thought of as $S^1$ modulo the relation the antipodal points are identified. Projecting onto a tangent line, we see that we get a copy of $\RR$ plus a single point at infinity, corresponding to the parallel line (drawn in cyan below). \begin{center} \begin{asy} size(7cm); filldraw(unitcircle, lightblue+opacity(0.2), heavyblue+opacity(0.4)); label("$S^1$", dir(225), dir(225), lightblue); dot("$\vec 0$", origin, dir(45)); pair X1 = (-2.1,1); pair X2 = (1.9,1); draw(X1--X2, heavyred, Arrows); dot("$0$", (0,1), dir(90), heavyred); dot("$1$", (1,1), dir(90), heavyred); pair P = extension( (0,1), (1,1), dir(250), dir(70) ); dot("$0.36$", P, dir(90), heavyred); label("$\mathbb R$", X2, dir(105), heavyred); path L(pair A, pair B, real a=0.6, real b=a) { return (a*(A-B)+A)--(b*(B-A)+B); } draw(L(dir(130),-dir(130),0.2,0.2), gray); draw(L(dir(250),-dir(250),0.2,0.2), gray); draw(L(dir(-20),-dir(-20),0.2,0.2), gray); draw(L(dir(0), -dir(0), 0.4,0.4), heavycyan+1); \end{asy} \end{center} Thus, the points of $\RP^1$ have two forms: \begin{itemize} \ii $(x:1)$, which we think of as $x \in \RR$ (in dark red above), and \ii $(1:0)$, which we think of as $1/0 = \infty$, corresponding to the cyan line above. \end{itemize} So, we can literally write \[ \RP^1 = \RR \cup \{\infty\}. \] Note that $\RP^1$ is also the boundary of $\RP^2$. In fact, note also that topologically we have \[ \RP^1 \cong S^1 \] since it is the ``real line with endpoints fused together''. \begin{center} \begin{asy} size(2cm); draw(unitcircle, heavyred); dot("$\infty$", dir(90), dir(90), heavycyan); dot("$0$", dir(-90), dir(-90), heavyred); \end{asy} \end{center} \end{example} Since $\RP^n$ is just ``$\RR^n$ (or $D^n$) with $\RP^{n-1}$ as its boundary'', we can construct $\RP^n$ as a CW complex inductively. Note that $\RP^n$ thus consists of \textbf{one cell in each dimension}. \begin{example}[$\RP^n$ as a cell complex] \listhack \begin{enumerate}[(a)] \ii $\RP^0$ is a single point. \ii $\RP^1 \cong S^1$ is a circle, which as a CW complex is a $0$-cell plus a $1$-cell. \ii $\RP^2$ can be formed by taking a $2$-cell and wrapping its perimeter twice around a copy of $\RP^1$. \end{enumerate} \end{example} \subsection{Complex projective space} The \vocab{complex projective space} $\CP^n$ is defined like $\RP^n$ with coordinates, i.e.\ \[ (z_0 : z_1 : \dots : z_n) \] under scaling; this time $z_i$ are complex. As before, $\CP^n$ can be thought of as $\CC^n$ augmented with some points at infinity (corresponding to $\CP^{n-1}$). \begin{example} [Complex projective space] \listhack \begin{enumerate}[(a)] \ii $\CP^0$ is a single point. \ii $\CP^1$ is $\CC$ plus a single point at infinity (``complex infinity'' if you will). That means as before we can think of $\CP^1$ as \[ \CP^1 = \CC \cup \{\infty\}. \] So, imagine taking the complex plane and then adding a single point to encompass the entire boundary. The result is just sphere $S^2$. \end{enumerate} Here is a picture of $\CP^1$ with its coordinate system, the \vocab{Riemann sphere}. \begin{center} \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{media/earth.pdf} \end{center} \end{example} \begin{remark} [For Euclidean geometers] You may recognize that while $\RP^2$ is the setting for projective geometry, inversion about a circle is done in $\CP^1$ instead. When one does an inversion sending generalized circles to generalized circles, there is only one point at infinity: this is why we work in $\CP^n$. \end{remark} Like $\RP^n$, $\CP^n$ is a CW complex, built inductively by taking $\CC^n$ and welding its boundary onto $\CP^{n-1}$ The difference is that as topological spaces, \[ \CC^n \cong \RR^{2n} \cong D^{2n}. \] Thus, we attach the cells $D^0$, $D^2$, $D^4$ and so on inductively to construct $\CP^n$. Thus we see that \begin{moral} $\CP^n$ consists of one cell in each \emph{even} dimension. \end{moral} \section\problemhead \begin{problem} Show that a space $X$ is Hausdorff if and only if the diagonal $\{(x,x) \mid x \in X\}$ is closed in the product space $X \times X$. \end{problem} \begin{problem} Realize the following spaces as CW complexes: \begin{enumerate}[(a)] \ii M\"obius strip. \ii $\RR$. \ii $\RR^n$. \end{enumerate} \end{problem} \begin{dproblem} Show that a finite CW complex is compact. \begin{hint} Prove and use the fact that a quotients of compact spaces remain compact. \end{hint} \end{dproblem}