Spaces:
Running
Running
output,flag,username,timestamp | |
" | |
<div> | |
<h4>Edited text:</h4> | |
<p>It seems we're moving a bit slower than anticipated. I'm concerned we might not meet our shipping deadline.</p> | |
<h4>Details:</h4> | |
<ul> | |
<li>Critique: This is well-phrased and less inflammatory than the original. However, it might be more direct and still polite to say: 'We're behind schedule. I'm concerned we might not make our shipping deadline.'</li> | |
<li>Faithfulness score: 95%</li> | |
<li>Spicy score: 10%</li> | |
<li>Overall score: 97%</li> | |
<li>Iterations: 33% 2 of max allowed iterations: 6</li> | |
<li>Time used: 2.24 seconds</li> | |
<li>LLM requests made: 4</li> | |
</ul> | |
</div> | |
",,,2024-02-29 17:35:32.665693 | |
" | |
<div> | |
<h4>Edited text:</h4> | |
<p>It seems your understanding of a balanced diet differs from mine, as it appears to include biscuits quite often.</p> | |
<h4>Details:</h4> | |
<ul> | |
<li>Critique: This critique is more subtle and less confrontational, which is good for preventing inflaming discussions. However, it could be more concise and closer to the original semantic intent. A possible revision could be: 'Your concept of a balanced diet appears to involve biscuits more often than usual.'</li> | |
<li>Faithfulness score: 95%</li> | |
<li>Spicy score: 10%</li> | |
<li>Overall score: 97%</li> | |
<li>Iterations: 33% 2 of max allowed iterations: 6</li> | |
<li>Time used: 2.36 seconds</li> | |
<li>LLM requests made: 4</li> | |
</ul> | |
</div> | |
",,,2024-02-29 17:35:35.029163 | |