Datasets:

Erland

/

NLP701_Assignment2_Subtask3_KTO_Dataset_4

like 0

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia has a clear plan to resolve the conflict in Ukraine The conflict in Ukraine may end either by diplomatic or military means. However, it can be possible only after Moscow achieves its goals. "An opportunity to resolve the conflict will appear only when Ukraine ceases to pose a threat to Russia and discriminate against Russian-speaking Ukrainians,” Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's Ambassador to the UN Security Council, said at a briefing at the UN Security Council. "If this result can be achieved through negotiations, we are ready for such a scenario. If not, then our objectives will be achieved by military means," he added. Russia is not fighting against the Ukrainian people. Russia is fighting against the criminal nationalist regime that came to power in 2014” after the coup in Kyiv, the diplomat said. "The new Ukrainian leadership is trying to purge the country of everything connected with Russia and glorify Nazi accomplices. <…> "The Kyiv regime and its most rabid patrons have forgotten the meaning of the word "peace." It is no coincidence that the European Union finances arms supplies to Kyiv through the European Peace Fund, without even thinking about how blasphemous it sounds and looks. <…> "Ukraine, in fact, has become a NATO PMC. It gets money, weapons and intelligence data. Ukraine receives instructions which targets to attack and where. It is the Ukrainian people who suffer from this in the first place and the people of Ukraine are forced to fight for the sake of someone else's tasks." However, the Russian Ambassador to the UN said, everything could have ended differently for Ukraine, if Kyiv had implemented the now-defunct Minsk Agreements that were signed in 2014 and 2015 "in an attempt to pave the way for peace by granting the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics a special status as part of the Ukrainian state". Former Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel and ex-president of France Francois Hollande later confirmed that neither sitting President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, nor his predecessors, nor France and Germany, who were involved in the Minks Agreements process, never intended to fulfil them. This diplomatic process served only as a "smoke screen" behind which they secretly armed Ukraine against Russia. Merkel's and Hollande's confessions caused an uproar in Moscow. Russian officials called them a formalisation of betrayal. Interestingly, though, no one in the West was embarrassed about those statements. It appears that the West continues implementing its strategy. In December, Ukraine put forward the idea of the Global Peace Summit based on Zelensky's "peace formula." In that formula, among other things, Zelensky demanded Russia should withdraw its troops from all Ukrainian territories. Moscow dismissed the plan as it ignored the new status of Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, Kherson, Zaporozhye (Zaporizhzhia) regions and Crimea as part of Russia. Now Kyiv has a new "idea": The Ukrainian administration wants to hold a "peace summit" at UN headquarters in New York on February 24 (one year anniversary since the start of the special operation), but without Moscow's participation. According to The Associated Press, Ukrainian President Zelenskiy was planning to visit New York in February to address a high-level meeting of the 193-member General Assembly on the eve of the first anniversary of Russia's February 24 invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine would like the UN General Assembly to adopt two resolutions: "Peace talks could start after the UN General Assembly passes the resolutions or after the proposed summit is held," Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova said. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text attacks Ukraine's attempt to solve the conflict via diplomatic means as well as accuses Ukraine of having a criminal government and being under Western influence, also claiming that Ukraine is the aggressor.

EN_UA_011260.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

none

Throughout all the text, Ukraine is discredited as threatening Russian-speaking population, having a criminal government, and implement ethnic cleansing in its territories. This is accomplished through the use of one-sided reporting that gradually takes opinion form accusing Ukraine and Western allies of being the aggressors.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia has a clear plan to resolve the conflict in Ukraine The conflict in Ukraine may end either by diplomatic or military means. However, it can be possible only after Moscow achieves its goals. "An opportunity to resolve the conflict will appear only when Ukraine ceases to pose a threat to Russia and discriminate against Russian-speaking Ukrainians,” Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's Ambassador to the UN Security Council, said at a briefing at the UN Security Council. "If this result can be achieved through negotiations, we are ready for such a scenario. If not, then our objectives will be achieved by military means," he added. Russia is not fighting against the Ukrainian people. Russia is fighting against the criminal nationalist regime that came to power in 2014” after the coup in Kyiv, the diplomat said. "The new Ukrainian leadership is trying to purge the country of everything connected with Russia and glorify Nazi accomplices. <…> "The Kyiv regime and its most rabid patrons have forgotten the meaning of the word "peace." It is no coincidence that the European Union finances arms supplies to Kyiv through the European Peace Fund, without even thinking about how blasphemous it sounds and looks. <…> "Ukraine, in fact, has become a NATO PMC. It gets money, weapons and intelligence data. Ukraine receives instructions which targets to attack and where. It is the Ukrainian people who suffer from this in the first place and the people of Ukraine are forced to fight for the sake of someone else's tasks." However, the Russian Ambassador to the UN said, everything could have ended differently for Ukraine, if Kyiv had implemented the now-defunct Minsk Agreements that were signed in 2014 and 2015 "in an attempt to pave the way for peace by granting the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics a special status as part of the Ukrainian state". Former Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel and ex-president of France Francois Hollande later confirmed that neither sitting President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, nor his predecessors, nor France and Germany, who were involved in the Minks Agreements process, never intended to fulfil them. This diplomatic process served only as a "smoke screen" behind which they secretly armed Ukraine against Russia. Merkel's and Hollande's confessions caused an uproar in Moscow. Russian officials called them a formalisation of betrayal. Interestingly, though, no one in the West was embarrassed about those statements. It appears that the West continues implementing its strategy. In December, Ukraine put forward the idea of the Global Peace Summit based on Zelensky's "peace formula." In that formula, among other things, Zelensky demanded Russia should withdraw its troops from all Ukrainian territories. Moscow dismissed the plan as it ignored the new status of Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, Kherson, Zaporozhye (Zaporizhzhia) regions and Crimea as part of Russia. Now Kyiv has a new "idea": The Ukrainian administration wants to hold a "peace summit" at UN headquarters in New York on February 24 (one year anniversary since the start of the special operation), but without Moscow's participation. According to The Associated Press, Ukrainian President Zelenskiy was planning to visit New York in February to address a high-level meeting of the 193-member General Assembly on the eve of the first anniversary of Russia's February 24 invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine would like the UN General Assembly to adopt two resolutions: "Peace talks could start after the UN General Assembly passes the resolutions or after the proposed summit is held," Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova said. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs suggest that Ukraine is a proxy for the West, allowing the West to attack Russia. Ukraine is also described as a failure since none of the suggested plans for peace talks worked.

EN_UA_011260.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

none

Throughout all the text, Ukraine is discredited as threatening Russian-speaking population, having a criminal government, and implement ethnic cleansing in its territories. This is accomplished through the use of one-sided reporting that gradually takes opinion form accusing Ukraine and Western allies of being the aggressors.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia has a clear plan to resolve the conflict in Ukraine The conflict in Ukraine may end either by diplomatic or military means. However, it can be possible only after Moscow achieves its goals. "An opportunity to resolve the conflict will appear only when Ukraine ceases to pose a threat to Russia and discriminate against Russian-speaking Ukrainians,” Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's Ambassador to the UN Security Council, said at a briefing at the UN Security Council. "If this result can be achieved through negotiations, we are ready for such a scenario. If not, then our objectives will be achieved by military means," he added. Russia is not fighting against the Ukrainian people. Russia is fighting against the criminal nationalist regime that came to power in 2014” after the coup in Kyiv, the diplomat said. "The new Ukrainian leadership is trying to purge the country of everything connected with Russia and glorify Nazi accomplices. <…> "The Kyiv regime and its most rabid patrons have forgotten the meaning of the word "peace." It is no coincidence that the European Union finances arms supplies to Kyiv through the European Peace Fund, without even thinking about how blasphemous it sounds and looks. <…> "Ukraine, in fact, has become a NATO PMC. It gets money, weapons and intelligence data. Ukraine receives instructions which targets to attack and where. It is the Ukrainian people who suffer from this in the first place and the people of Ukraine are forced to fight for the sake of someone else's tasks." However, the Russian Ambassador to the UN said, everything could have ended differently for Ukraine, if Kyiv had implemented the now-defunct Minsk Agreements that were signed in 2014 and 2015 "in an attempt to pave the way for peace by granting the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics a special status as part of the Ukrainian state". Former Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel and ex-president of France Francois Hollande later confirmed that neither sitting President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, nor his predecessors, nor France and Germany, who were involved in the Minks Agreements process, never intended to fulfil them. This diplomatic process served only as a "smoke screen" behind which they secretly armed Ukraine against Russia. Merkel's and Hollande's confessions caused an uproar in Moscow. Russian officials called them a formalisation of betrayal. Interestingly, though, no one in the West was embarrassed about those statements. It appears that the West continues implementing its strategy. In December, Ukraine put forward the idea of the Global Peace Summit based on Zelensky's "peace formula." In that formula, among other things, Zelensky demanded Russia should withdraw its troops from all Ukrainian territories. Moscow dismissed the plan as it ignored the new status of Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, Kherson, Zaporozhye (Zaporizhzhia) regions and Crimea as part of Russia. Now Kyiv has a new "idea": The Ukrainian administration wants to hold a "peace summit" at UN headquarters in New York on February 24 (one year anniversary since the start of the special operation), but without Moscow's participation. According to The Associated Press, Ukrainian President Zelenskiy was planning to visit New York in February to address a high-level meeting of the 193-member General Assembly on the eve of the first anniversary of Russia's February 24 invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine would like the UN General Assembly to adopt two resolutions: "Peace talks could start after the UN General Assembly passes the resolutions or after the proposed summit is held," Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova said. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text presents several passages in which Ukraine and Ukrainians are associated with evil forces, pointing out their Russophobic and Nazist ideology

EN_UA_011260.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

none

Throughout all the text, Ukraine is discredited as threatening Russian-speaking population, having a criminal government, and implement ethnic cleansing in its territories. This is accomplished through the use of one-sided reporting that gradually takes opinion form accusing Ukraine and Western allies of being the aggressors.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia has a clear plan to resolve the conflict in Ukraine The conflict in Ukraine may end either by diplomatic or military means. However, it can be possible only after Moscow achieves its goals. "An opportunity to resolve the conflict will appear only when Ukraine ceases to pose a threat to Russia and discriminate against Russian-speaking Ukrainians,” Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's Ambassador to the UN Security Council, said at a briefing at the UN Security Council. "If this result can be achieved through negotiations, we are ready for such a scenario. If not, then our objectives will be achieved by military means," he added. Russia is not fighting against the Ukrainian people. Russia is fighting against the criminal nationalist regime that came to power in 2014” after the coup in Kyiv, the diplomat said. "The new Ukrainian leadership is trying to purge the country of everything connected with Russia and glorify Nazi accomplices. <…> "The Kyiv regime and its most rabid patrons have forgotten the meaning of the word "peace." It is no coincidence that the European Union finances arms supplies to Kyiv through the European Peace Fund, without even thinking about how blasphemous it sounds and looks. <…> "Ukraine, in fact, has become a NATO PMC. It gets money, weapons and intelligence data. Ukraine receives instructions which targets to attack and where. It is the Ukrainian people who suffer from this in the first place and the people of Ukraine are forced to fight for the sake of someone else's tasks." However, the Russian Ambassador to the UN said, everything could have ended differently for Ukraine, if Kyiv had implemented the now-defunct Minsk Agreements that were signed in 2014 and 2015 "in an attempt to pave the way for peace by granting the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics a special status as part of the Ukrainian state". Former Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel and ex-president of France Francois Hollande later confirmed that neither sitting President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, nor his predecessors, nor France and Germany, who were involved in the Minks Agreements process, never intended to fulfil them. This diplomatic process served only as a "smoke screen" behind which they secretly armed Ukraine against Russia. Merkel's and Hollande's confessions caused an uproar in Moscow. Russian officials called them a formalisation of betrayal. Interestingly, though, no one in the West was embarrassed about those statements. It appears that the West continues implementing its strategy. In December, Ukraine put forward the idea of the Global Peace Summit based on Zelensky's "peace formula." In that formula, among other things, Zelensky demanded Russia should withdraw its troops from all Ukrainian territories. Moscow dismissed the plan as it ignored the new status of Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, Kherson, Zaporozhye (Zaporizhzhia) regions and Crimea as part of Russia. Now Kyiv has a new "idea": The Ukrainian administration wants to hold a "peace summit" at UN headquarters in New York on February 24 (one year anniversary since the start of the special operation), but without Moscow's participation. According to The Associated Press, Ukrainian President Zelenskiy was planning to visit New York in February to address a high-level meeting of the 193-member General Assembly on the eve of the first anniversary of Russia's February 24 invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine would like the UN General Assembly to adopt two resolutions: "Peace talks could start after the UN General Assembly passes the resolutions or after the proposed summit is held," Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova said. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs discredit Ukraine by accusing them of implementing fascist policies while at the same time being puppets of Western countries

EN_UA_011260.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

none

Throughout all the text, Ukraine is discredited as threatening Russian-speaking population, having a criminal government, and implement ethnic cleansing in its territories. This is accomplished through the use of one-sided reporting that gradually takes opinion form accusing Ukraine and Western allies of being the aggressors.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia has a clear plan to resolve the conflict in Ukraine The conflict in Ukraine may end either by diplomatic or military means. However, it can be possible only after Moscow achieves its goals. "An opportunity to resolve the conflict will appear only when Ukraine ceases to pose a threat to Russia and discriminate against Russian-speaking Ukrainians,” Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's Ambassador to the UN Security Council, said at a briefing at the UN Security Council. "If this result can be achieved through negotiations, we are ready for such a scenario. If not, then our objectives will be achieved by military means," he added. Russia is not fighting against the Ukrainian people. Russia is fighting against the criminal nationalist regime that came to power in 2014” after the coup in Kyiv, the diplomat said. "The new Ukrainian leadership is trying to purge the country of everything connected with Russia and glorify Nazi accomplices. <…> "The Kyiv regime and its most rabid patrons have forgotten the meaning of the word "peace." It is no coincidence that the European Union finances arms supplies to Kyiv through the European Peace Fund, without even thinking about how blasphemous it sounds and looks. <…> "Ukraine, in fact, has become a NATO PMC. It gets money, weapons and intelligence data. Ukraine receives instructions which targets to attack and where. It is the Ukrainian people who suffer from this in the first place and the people of Ukraine are forced to fight for the sake of someone else's tasks." However, the Russian Ambassador to the UN said, everything could have ended differently for Ukraine, if Kyiv had implemented the now-defunct Minsk Agreements that were signed in 2014 and 2015 "in an attempt to pave the way for peace by granting the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics a special status as part of the Ukrainian state". Former Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel and ex-president of France Francois Hollande later confirmed that neither sitting President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, nor his predecessors, nor France and Germany, who were involved in the Minks Agreements process, never intended to fulfil them. This diplomatic process served only as a "smoke screen" behind which they secretly armed Ukraine against Russia. Merkel's and Hollande's confessions caused an uproar in Moscow. Russian officials called them a formalisation of betrayal. Interestingly, though, no one in the West was embarrassed about those statements. It appears that the West continues implementing its strategy. In December, Ukraine put forward the idea of the Global Peace Summit based on Zelensky's "peace formula." In that formula, among other things, Zelensky demanded Russia should withdraw its troops from all Ukrainian territories. Moscow dismissed the plan as it ignored the new status of Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, Kherson, Zaporozhye (Zaporizhzhia) regions and Crimea as part of Russia. Now Kyiv has a new "idea": The Ukrainian administration wants to hold a "peace summit" at UN headquarters in New York on February 24 (one year anniversary since the start of the special operation), but without Moscow's participation. According to The Associated Press, Ukrainian President Zelenskiy was planning to visit New York in February to address a high-level meeting of the 193-member General Assembly on the eve of the first anniversary of Russia's February 24 invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine would like the UN General Assembly to adopt two resolutions: "Peace talks could start after the UN General Assembly passes the resolutions or after the proposed summit is held," Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova said. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs discredit Ukraine in different ways, mainly underlining that the Ukrainian army is doing the dirty job of Western countries

EN_UA_011260.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

none

Throughout all the text, Ukraine is discredited as threatening Russian-speaking population, having a criminal government, and implement ethnic cleansing in its territories. This is accomplished through the use of one-sided reporting that gradually takes opinion form accusing Ukraine and Western allies of being the aggressors.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative According to the Gospel of the Global Warming Hoax, 1850–1910 was the coldest period of the past millennium. Yet glaciers were retreating rapidly. Now that the planet allegedly has a fever, the retreat has slowed dramatically and even reversed: Our moonbat rulers canceled the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age for failing to comply with climate ideology. But preventing glaciers from growing is more difficult than doctoring the historical record to support climate con man Michael Mann’s spurious hockey stick graph. Nonetheless, prophet of doom Al Gore shouts that “we could lose our capacity for self-governance” if we don’t surrender still more freedom to Big Government so that it can fix the supposedly broken weather. On tips from Lyle and Wiggins. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author claims that glaciers are not melting due to climate change. He provides historical evidence discrediting climate movement and Al Gore

EN_CC_100124.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting

The text conveys a narrative claiming that glaciers are not melting. In doing so, they present alleged evidence discrediting climate movement, labeling some prominent figures as alarmist and being in bad faith

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative According to the Gospel of the Global Warming Hoax, 1850–1910 was the coldest period of the past millennium. Yet glaciers were retreating rapidly. Now that the planet allegedly has a fever, the retreat has slowed dramatically and even reversed: Our moonbat rulers canceled the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age for failing to comply with climate ideology. But preventing glaciers from growing is more difficult than doctoring the historical record to support climate con man Michael Mann’s spurious hockey stick graph. Nonetheless, prophet of doom Al Gore shouts that “we could lose our capacity for self-governance” if we don’t surrender still more freedom to Big Government so that it can fix the supposedly broken weather. On tips from Lyle and Wiggins. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a narrative underlining the fact that ice is not melting, since glaciers are not retreating anymore, suggesting that behind this there is a conflict between climate movement and scientific evidence.

EN_CC_100124.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting

The text conveys a narrative claiming that glaciers are not melting. In doing so, they present alleged evidence discrediting climate movement, labeling some prominent figures as alarmist and being in bad faith

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative According to the Gospel of the Global Warming Hoax, 1850–1910 was the coldest period of the past millennium. Yet glaciers were retreating rapidly. Now that the planet allegedly has a fever, the retreat has slowed dramatically and even reversed: Our moonbat rulers canceled the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age for failing to comply with climate ideology. But preventing glaciers from growing is more difficult than doctoring the historical record to support climate con man Michael Mann’s spurious hockey stick graph. Nonetheless, prophet of doom Al Gore shouts that “we could lose our capacity for self-governance” if we don’t surrender still more freedom to Big Government so that it can fix the supposedly broken weather. On tips from Lyle and Wiggins. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article alleging that ice is not melting due to climate change since ice is actually growing. Several paragraphs highlight studies discrediting claims of the negative effects of CO2 on environment, indicating alleged fraud by climate movement

EN_CC_100124.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting

The text conveys a narrative claiming that glaciers are not melting. In doing so, they present alleged evidence discrediting climate movement, labeling some prominent figures as alarmist and being in bad faith

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative According to the Gospel of the Global Warming Hoax, 1850–1910 was the coldest period of the past millennium. Yet glaciers were retreating rapidly. Now that the planet allegedly has a fever, the retreat has slowed dramatically and even reversed: Our moonbat rulers canceled the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age for failing to comply with climate ideology. But preventing glaciers from growing is more difficult than doctoring the historical record to support climate con man Michael Mann’s spurious hockey stick graph. Nonetheless, prophet of doom Al Gore shouts that “we could lose our capacity for self-governance” if we don’t surrender still more freedom to Big Government so that it can fix the supposedly broken weather. On tips from Lyle and Wiggins. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article reports several quotes from climate movement's activists and scientists who argue that ice is not melting. These quotes are framed as absurd given the alleged evidence that the climate is warming

EN_CC_100124.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting

The text conveys a narrative claiming that glaciers are not melting. In doing so, they present alleged evidence discrediting climate movement, labeling some prominent figures as alarmist and being in bad faith

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative According to the Gospel of the Global Warming Hoax, 1850–1910 was the coldest period of the past millennium. Yet glaciers were retreating rapidly. Now that the planet allegedly has a fever, the retreat has slowed dramatically and even reversed: Our moonbat rulers canceled the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age for failing to comply with climate ideology. But preventing glaciers from growing is more difficult than doctoring the historical record to support climate con man Michael Mann’s spurious hockey stick graph. Nonetheless, prophet of doom Al Gore shouts that “we could lose our capacity for self-governance” if we don’t surrender still more freedom to Big Government so that it can fix the supposedly broken weather. On tips from Lyle and Wiggins. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs suggest that ice is not melting based on alleged scientific evidences, claiming that there is no evidence of rising temperatures and glaciers retreat.

EN_CC_100124.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting

The text conveys a narrative claiming that glaciers are not melting. In doing so, they present alleged evidence discrediting climate movement, labeling some prominent figures as alarmist and being in bad faith

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oxford Residents Mount Resistance Against the Sectioning of Their Streets OXFORD RESIDENTS MOUNT RESISTANCE AGAINST THE SECTIONING OF THEIR STREETS THE GREAT CLIMATE CON Oxford residents are taking matters into their own hands and destroying the street zone sectioning barriers. Oxford is going to be the centre of the resistance to the climate change madness in the UK. . Just recently there was a day of action by activists to kick start the year of fighting back. We predicted the UK was just getting started with their resistance, and here we have it. Taking matters into their own hands, Oxford residents are destroying street zoning barriers. Now that’s quite beautiful to see. Further action There are further planned dates for activists to take to the streets in various forms of protest. Piers Corbyn and friends are taking to the streets on Friday the 13th of January., Starting at Southwark tube in London. Then an event which has potential to draw a large crowd with reports coming in people are making the trip down from as far as Manchester is taking place in Oxford on the 18th of February. It’s very inspiring to see the people of the UK take matters into their own hands. This year is looking to be jam packed with resistance to The Climate Con. Continued coverage will be given on our website, newsletter and social media. Stay tuned for a disobedient 2023. If you want to support the fight against The Climate Con, paid members get access to the 2nd part of The Climate Con Podcast. Or you can make a donation here. The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB) Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning. say no to all the tyrants do not let the fachist illuminati force human beings being forced into 15 minute prison cities which is a crime against humanity for a climate change scam this cabal invented to inslave us all. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article talks about resistance movement in the UK against the government's policy which is described as "climate con"

EN_CC_100002.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the resistance movement against Climate Con Programme initiated by the UK government. The article does not really specify what the residents are specifically resisting, as the article does not give insights into this programme.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oxford Residents Mount Resistance Against the Sectioning of Their Streets OXFORD RESIDENTS MOUNT RESISTANCE AGAINST THE SECTIONING OF THEIR STREETS THE GREAT CLIMATE CON Oxford residents are taking matters into their own hands and destroying the street zone sectioning barriers. Oxford is going to be the centre of the resistance to the climate change madness in the UK. . Just recently there was a day of action by activists to kick start the year of fighting back. We predicted the UK was just getting started with their resistance, and here we have it. Taking matters into their own hands, Oxford residents are destroying street zoning barriers. Now that’s quite beautiful to see. Further action There are further planned dates for activists to take to the streets in various forms of protest. Piers Corbyn and friends are taking to the streets on Friday the 13th of January., Starting at Southwark tube in London. Then an event which has potential to draw a large crowd with reports coming in people are making the trip down from as far as Manchester is taking place in Oxford on the 18th of February. It’s very inspiring to see the people of the UK take matters into their own hands. This year is looking to be jam packed with resistance to The Climate Con. Continued coverage will be given on our website, newsletter and social media. Stay tuned for a disobedient 2023. If you want to support the fight against The Climate Con, paid members get access to the 2nd part of The Climate Con Podcast. Or you can make a donation here. The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB) Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning. say no to all the tyrants do not let the fachist illuminati force human beings being forced into 15 minute prison cities which is a crime against humanity for a climate change scam this cabal invented to inslave us all. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article talks about a local authority that has implemented climate policies that people are against, thus they take matters into their own hands and destroy them. The article is about UK citizens being against their government and taking action into their own hands.

EN_CC_100002.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the resistance movement against Climate Con Programme initiated by the UK government. The article does not really specify what the residents are specifically resisting, as the article does not give insights into this programme.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oxford Residents Mount Resistance Against the Sectioning of Their Streets OXFORD RESIDENTS MOUNT RESISTANCE AGAINST THE SECTIONING OF THEIR STREETS THE GREAT CLIMATE CON Oxford residents are taking matters into their own hands and destroying the street zone sectioning barriers. Oxford is going to be the centre of the resistance to the climate change madness in the UK. . Just recently there was a day of action by activists to kick start the year of fighting back. We predicted the UK was just getting started with their resistance, and here we have it. Taking matters into their own hands, Oxford residents are destroying street zoning barriers. Now that’s quite beautiful to see. Further action There are further planned dates for activists to take to the streets in various forms of protest. Piers Corbyn and friends are taking to the streets on Friday the 13th of January., Starting at Southwark tube in London. Then an event which has potential to draw a large crowd with reports coming in people are making the trip down from as far as Manchester is taking place in Oxford on the 18th of February. It’s very inspiring to see the people of the UK take matters into their own hands. This year is looking to be jam packed with resistance to The Climate Con. Continued coverage will be given on our website, newsletter and social media. Stay tuned for a disobedient 2023. If you want to support the fight against The Climate Con, paid members get access to the 2nd part of The Climate Con Podcast. Or you can make a donation here. The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB) Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning. say no to all the tyrants do not let the fachist illuminati force human beings being forced into 15 minute prison cities which is a crime against humanity for a climate change scam this cabal invented to inslave us all. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text attacks the UK government for implementing the Climate Con within the context of the 15-minute cities. The text also criticises the UK government for not acting in a legitimate way since they would be imposing restrictions that are considered an attack to the population and against humanity.

EN_CC_100002.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the resistance movement against Climate Con Programme initiated by the UK government. The article does not really specify what the residents are specifically resisting, as the article does not give insights into this programme.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oxford Residents Mount Resistance Against the Sectioning of Their Streets OXFORD RESIDENTS MOUNT RESISTANCE AGAINST THE SECTIONING OF THEIR STREETS THE GREAT CLIMATE CON Oxford residents are taking matters into their own hands and destroying the street zone sectioning barriers. Oxford is going to be the centre of the resistance to the climate change madness in the UK. . Just recently there was a day of action by activists to kick start the year of fighting back. We predicted the UK was just getting started with their resistance, and here we have it. Taking matters into their own hands, Oxford residents are destroying street zoning barriers. Now that’s quite beautiful to see. Further action There are further planned dates for activists to take to the streets in various forms of protest. Piers Corbyn and friends are taking to the streets on Friday the 13th of January., Starting at Southwark tube in London. Then an event which has potential to draw a large crowd with reports coming in people are making the trip down from as far as Manchester is taking place in Oxford on the 18th of February. It’s very inspiring to see the people of the UK take matters into their own hands. This year is looking to be jam packed with resistance to The Climate Con. Continued coverage will be given on our website, newsletter and social media. Stay tuned for a disobedient 2023. If you want to support the fight against The Climate Con, paid members get access to the 2nd part of The Climate Con Podcast. Or you can make a donation here. The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB) Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning. say no to all the tyrants do not let the fachist illuminati force human beings being forced into 15 minute prison cities which is a crime against humanity for a climate change scam this cabal invented to inslave us all. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs convey a sense of resentment towards the British government for implementing policies perceived as ineffective and harmful for the well-being of citizens

EN_CC_100002.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the resistance movement against Climate Con Programme initiated by the UK government. The article does not really specify what the residents are specifically resisting, as the article does not give insights into this programme.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oxford Residents Mount Resistance Against the Sectioning of Their Streets OXFORD RESIDENTS MOUNT RESISTANCE AGAINST THE SECTIONING OF THEIR STREETS THE GREAT CLIMATE CON Oxford residents are taking matters into their own hands and destroying the street zone sectioning barriers. Oxford is going to be the centre of the resistance to the climate change madness in the UK. . Just recently there was a day of action by activists to kick start the year of fighting back. We predicted the UK was just getting started with their resistance, and here we have it. Taking matters into their own hands, Oxford residents are destroying street zoning barriers. Now that’s quite beautiful to see. Further action There are further planned dates for activists to take to the streets in various forms of protest. Piers Corbyn and friends are taking to the streets on Friday the 13th of January., Starting at Southwark tube in London. Then an event which has potential to draw a large crowd with reports coming in people are making the trip down from as far as Manchester is taking place in Oxford on the 18th of February. It’s very inspiring to see the people of the UK take matters into their own hands. This year is looking to be jam packed with resistance to The Climate Con. Continued coverage will be given on our website, newsletter and social media. Stay tuned for a disobedient 2023. If you want to support the fight against The Climate Con, paid members get access to the 2nd part of The Climate Con Podcast. Or you can make a donation here. The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB) Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning. say no to all the tyrants do not let the fachist illuminati force human beings being forced into 15 minute prison cities which is a crime against humanity for a climate change scam this cabal invented to inslave us all. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text attacks the UK government for implementing the Climate Con program. It adopts a conspirational tone calling it a scam that aims at enslaving the population.

EN_CC_100002.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the resistance movement against Climate Con Programme initiated by the UK government. The article does not really specify what the residents are specifically resisting, as the article does not give insights into this programme.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas Germany’s employers and unions have joined together in opposing an immediate European Union ban on natural gas imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, saying such a move would lead to factory shutdowns and the loss of jobs in the bloc’s largest economy. “A rapid gas embargo would lead to loss of production, shutdowns, a further de-industrialization and the long-term loss of work positions in Germany,” said Rainer Dulger, chairman of the BDA employer’s group, and Reiner Hoffmann, chairman of the DGB trade union confederation, in a joint statement Monday on Germany’s dpa news agency. The statement comes as European leaders are discussing possible new energy sanctions against Russian oil, following a decision April 7 to ban Russian coal imports beginning in August. Ukraine’s leaders say revenues from Russia’s energy exports are financing Moscow’s destructive war on Ukraine and must be ended. That won’t be easy to do. The EU’s 27 nations get around 40% of their natural gas from Russia and around 25% of their oil. Natural gas would be the most difficult do without, energy analysts say, since most of it comes by pipeline from Russia and supplies of liquefied gas, which can be ordered by ship, are limited amid strong demand worldwide. Germany, a major manufacturing hub and an importer of Russian gas, has so far resisted an immediate shut-off and said it plans to instead phase out Russian oil by the end of the year and most Russian gas imports by mid-2024. The EU’s executive commission has outlined steps to cut the consumption of Russian gas by two-thirds by year’s end through using more pipeline gas from Norway and Azerbaijan, importing more liqueifed gas, accelerating the deployment of wind and solar projects and intensifying conservation efforts. German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck said in an interview with the Funke media group that “an immediate gas embargo would endanger social peace in Germany.” Despite widespread economic sanctions against Russian banks and individuals, the EU continues to send around $850 million a day to Russia for oil and gas, even as EU governments condemn the war in Ukraine. Gas-intensive companies include producers of glass, metals, ceramics and chemicals. Industry officials say in many cases natural gas would be impossible to replace in the short run. Analysts say Russian crude oil would be easier to replace than gas but that a boycott would still lead to higher energy prices that would hit consumers who are already facing record EU inflation of 7.5%. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article talks about the EU countries suffering from the consequences of the sanctions. The article talks about the harm done to the German economy and how it would further deteriorate if the sanctions are applied to oil as well.

EN_UA_101079.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

The text presents multiple paragraphs in which sanctions are considered detrimental for EU countries, specifically pointing out the case of Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas Germany’s employers and unions have joined together in opposing an immediate European Union ban on natural gas imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, saying such a move would lead to factory shutdowns and the loss of jobs in the bloc’s largest economy. “A rapid gas embargo would lead to loss of production, shutdowns, a further de-industrialization and the long-term loss of work positions in Germany,” said Rainer Dulger, chairman of the BDA employer’s group, and Reiner Hoffmann, chairman of the DGB trade union confederation, in a joint statement Monday on Germany’s dpa news agency. The statement comes as European leaders are discussing possible new energy sanctions against Russian oil, following a decision April 7 to ban Russian coal imports beginning in August. Ukraine’s leaders say revenues from Russia’s energy exports are financing Moscow’s destructive war on Ukraine and must be ended. That won’t be easy to do. The EU’s 27 nations get around 40% of their natural gas from Russia and around 25% of their oil. Natural gas would be the most difficult do without, energy analysts say, since most of it comes by pipeline from Russia and supplies of liquefied gas, which can be ordered by ship, are limited amid strong demand worldwide. Germany, a major manufacturing hub and an importer of Russian gas, has so far resisted an immediate shut-off and said it plans to instead phase out Russian oil by the end of the year and most Russian gas imports by mid-2024. The EU’s executive commission has outlined steps to cut the consumption of Russian gas by two-thirds by year’s end through using more pipeline gas from Norway and Azerbaijan, importing more liqueifed gas, accelerating the deployment of wind and solar projects and intensifying conservation efforts. German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck said in an interview with the Funke media group that “an immediate gas embargo would endanger social peace in Germany.” Despite widespread economic sanctions against Russian banks and individuals, the EU continues to send around $850 million a day to Russia for oil and gas, even as EU governments condemn the war in Ukraine. Gas-intensive companies include producers of glass, metals, ceramics and chemicals. Industry officials say in many cases natural gas would be impossible to replace in the short run. Analysts say Russian crude oil would be easier to replace than gas but that a boycott would still lead to higher energy prices that would hit consumers who are already facing record EU inflation of 7.5%. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs depict negative consequences for Germany of potential sanctions on Russian gas. They highlight that they will endanger social peace as well as damage the economy.

EN_UA_101079.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

The text presents multiple paragraphs in which sanctions are considered detrimental for EU countries, specifically pointing out the case of Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas Germany’s employers and unions have joined together in opposing an immediate European Union ban on natural gas imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, saying such a move would lead to factory shutdowns and the loss of jobs in the bloc’s largest economy. “A rapid gas embargo would lead to loss of production, shutdowns, a further de-industrialization and the long-term loss of work positions in Germany,” said Rainer Dulger, chairman of the BDA employer’s group, and Reiner Hoffmann, chairman of the DGB trade union confederation, in a joint statement Monday on Germany’s dpa news agency. The statement comes as European leaders are discussing possible new energy sanctions against Russian oil, following a decision April 7 to ban Russian coal imports beginning in August. Ukraine’s leaders say revenues from Russia’s energy exports are financing Moscow’s destructive war on Ukraine and must be ended. That won’t be easy to do. The EU’s 27 nations get around 40% of their natural gas from Russia and around 25% of their oil. Natural gas would be the most difficult do without, energy analysts say, since most of it comes by pipeline from Russia and supplies of liquefied gas, which can be ordered by ship, are limited amid strong demand worldwide. Germany, a major manufacturing hub and an importer of Russian gas, has so far resisted an immediate shut-off and said it plans to instead phase out Russian oil by the end of the year and most Russian gas imports by mid-2024. The EU’s executive commission has outlined steps to cut the consumption of Russian gas by two-thirds by year’s end through using more pipeline gas from Norway and Azerbaijan, importing more liqueifed gas, accelerating the deployment of wind and solar projects and intensifying conservation efforts. German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck said in an interview with the Funke media group that “an immediate gas embargo would endanger social peace in Germany.” Despite widespread economic sanctions against Russian banks and individuals, the EU continues to send around $850 million a day to Russia for oil and gas, even as EU governments condemn the war in Ukraine. Gas-intensive companies include producers of glass, metals, ceramics and chemicals. Industry officials say in many cases natural gas would be impossible to replace in the short run. Analysts say Russian crude oil would be easier to replace than gas but that a boycott would still lead to higher energy prices that would hit consumers who are already facing record EU inflation of 7.5%. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs mention that sanctions to Russian gas will lead to negative effects on the economy of Western countries, especially Germany. They mention a decrease of industrial production, as well as the loss of jobs

EN_UA_101079.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

The text presents multiple paragraphs in which sanctions are considered detrimental for EU countries, specifically pointing out the case of Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas Germany’s employers and unions have joined together in opposing an immediate European Union ban on natural gas imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, saying such a move would lead to factory shutdowns and the loss of jobs in the bloc’s largest economy. “A rapid gas embargo would lead to loss of production, shutdowns, a further de-industrialization and the long-term loss of work positions in Germany,” said Rainer Dulger, chairman of the BDA employer’s group, and Reiner Hoffmann, chairman of the DGB trade union confederation, in a joint statement Monday on Germany’s dpa news agency. The statement comes as European leaders are discussing possible new energy sanctions against Russian oil, following a decision April 7 to ban Russian coal imports beginning in August. Ukraine’s leaders say revenues from Russia’s energy exports are financing Moscow’s destructive war on Ukraine and must be ended. That won’t be easy to do. The EU’s 27 nations get around 40% of their natural gas from Russia and around 25% of their oil. Natural gas would be the most difficult do without, energy analysts say, since most of it comes by pipeline from Russia and supplies of liquefied gas, which can be ordered by ship, are limited amid strong demand worldwide. Germany, a major manufacturing hub and an importer of Russian gas, has so far resisted an immediate shut-off and said it plans to instead phase out Russian oil by the end of the year and most Russian gas imports by mid-2024. The EU’s executive commission has outlined steps to cut the consumption of Russian gas by two-thirds by year’s end through using more pipeline gas from Norway and Azerbaijan, importing more liqueifed gas, accelerating the deployment of wind and solar projects and intensifying conservation efforts. German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck said in an interview with the Funke media group that “an immediate gas embargo would endanger social peace in Germany.” Despite widespread economic sanctions against Russian banks and individuals, the EU continues to send around $850 million a day to Russia for oil and gas, even as EU governments condemn the war in Ukraine. Gas-intensive companies include producers of glass, metals, ceramics and chemicals. Industry officials say in many cases natural gas would be impossible to replace in the short run. Analysts say Russian crude oil would be easier to replace than gas but that a boycott would still lead to higher energy prices that would hit consumers who are already facing record EU inflation of 7.5%. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text has several paragraphs saying that imposing sanctions on natural gas from Russia would have negative consequences for the European Union, and particularly for the German economy, underlining that companies would close, production would decrease, and there would be job losses. The argument relies on the fact that natural gas is mostly imported by pipeline from Russia

EN_UA_101079.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

The text presents multiple paragraphs in which sanctions are considered detrimental for EU countries, specifically pointing out the case of Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas Germany’s employers and unions have joined together in opposing an immediate European Union ban on natural gas imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, saying such a move would lead to factory shutdowns and the loss of jobs in the bloc’s largest economy. “A rapid gas embargo would lead to loss of production, shutdowns, a further de-industrialization and the long-term loss of work positions in Germany,” said Rainer Dulger, chairman of the BDA employer’s group, and Reiner Hoffmann, chairman of the DGB trade union confederation, in a joint statement Monday on Germany’s dpa news agency. The statement comes as European leaders are discussing possible new energy sanctions against Russian oil, following a decision April 7 to ban Russian coal imports beginning in August. Ukraine’s leaders say revenues from Russia’s energy exports are financing Moscow’s destructive war on Ukraine and must be ended. That won’t be easy to do. The EU’s 27 nations get around 40% of their natural gas from Russia and around 25% of their oil. Natural gas would be the most difficult do without, energy analysts say, since most of it comes by pipeline from Russia and supplies of liquefied gas, which can be ordered by ship, are limited amid strong demand worldwide. Germany, a major manufacturing hub and an importer of Russian gas, has so far resisted an immediate shut-off and said it plans to instead phase out Russian oil by the end of the year and most Russian gas imports by mid-2024. The EU’s executive commission has outlined steps to cut the consumption of Russian gas by two-thirds by year’s end through using more pipeline gas from Norway and Azerbaijan, importing more liqueifed gas, accelerating the deployment of wind and solar projects and intensifying conservation efforts. German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck said in an interview with the Funke media group that “an immediate gas embargo would endanger social peace in Germany.” Despite widespread economic sanctions against Russian banks and individuals, the EU continues to send around $850 million a day to Russia for oil and gas, even as EU governments condemn the war in Ukraine. Gas-intensive companies include producers of glass, metals, ceramics and chemicals. Industry officials say in many cases natural gas would be impossible to replace in the short run. Analysts say Russian crude oil would be easier to replace than gas but that a boycott would still lead to higher energy prices that would hit consumers who are already facing record EU inflation of 7.5%. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article presents several paragraphs emphasing the negative impact of a potential Russian gas embargo on German economy. The main argument is the risk of social instability as well as loss of competitiveness compared to China and the US.

EN_UA_101079.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

The text presents multiple paragraphs in which sanctions are considered detrimental for EU countries, specifically pointing out the case of Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Denmark to Punish Farmers for Cow ‘Emissions’ to ‘Fight Global Warming’ by Frank Bergman, Slay News: The Danish government has introduced radical new laws that will tax livestock farmers for “emissions” from cows, pigs, and sheep to supposedly “fight global warming.” Demark has become the first country in the world to introduce a carbon tax that seeks to force farmers to comply with the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” agenda. The Scandinavian nation will tax farmers for the so-called “greenhouse gases” allegedly emitted by their livestock from 2030. Denmark’s globalist leaders claim they are targeting a major source of methane emissions, which they allege is one of the most potent gases contributing to “global warming.” In order to comply with the WEF’s “Net Zero” targets, Taxation Minister Jeppe Bruus said the aim is to reduce Danish “greenhouse gas emissions” by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030. As of 2030, Danish livestock farmers will be taxed $43 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2030. The tax will increase to $108 by 2035. However, because of an income tax deduction of 60%, the actual cost per ton will start at $17.3 and increase to $28 by 2035. Although carbon dioxide is typically blamed for causing “climate change,” globalists claim that methane traps about 87 times more heat on a 20-year timescale. However, as Slay News has previously reported, top scientists have debunked these claims as a hoax. A recent peer-reviewed study provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Earth’s atmosphere cannot cause “global warming.” Dr. Jan Kubicki led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth’s global temperatures. However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply isn’t possible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise. Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that Earth’s atmosphere is already “saturated” with carbon dioxide. This saturation means that, even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the “greenhouse gas” will not cause temperatures to rise. Nevertheless, unelected globalists at the United Nations Environment Program claim that livestock accounts for about 32% of “human-caused methane emissions.” “We will take a big step closer in becoming climate neutral in 2045,” Bruus said. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article questions the reliability of the measurement of carbon dioxide emissions using evidence of studies that disprove the claims.

EN_CC_200022.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change

The author argues that CO2 has no effect on the rise of temperature and it is a myth. The author targets Danish government who has introduced law that will tax livestock farmers for emissions from cows.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Denmark to Punish Farmers for Cow ‘Emissions’ to ‘Fight Global Warming’ by Frank Bergman, Slay News: The Danish government has introduced radical new laws that will tax livestock farmers for “emissions” from cows, pigs, and sheep to supposedly “fight global warming.” Demark has become the first country in the world to introduce a carbon tax that seeks to force farmers to comply with the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” agenda. The Scandinavian nation will tax farmers for the so-called “greenhouse gases” allegedly emitted by their livestock from 2030. Denmark’s globalist leaders claim they are targeting a major source of methane emissions, which they allege is one of the most potent gases contributing to “global warming.” In order to comply with the WEF’s “Net Zero” targets, Taxation Minister Jeppe Bruus said the aim is to reduce Danish “greenhouse gas emissions” by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030. As of 2030, Danish livestock farmers will be taxed $43 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2030. The tax will increase to $108 by 2035. However, because of an income tax deduction of 60%, the actual cost per ton will start at $17.3 and increase to $28 by 2035. Although carbon dioxide is typically blamed for causing “climate change,” globalists claim that methane traps about 87 times more heat on a 20-year timescale. However, as Slay News has previously reported, top scientists have debunked these claims as a hoax. A recent peer-reviewed study provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Earth’s atmosphere cannot cause “global warming.” Dr. Jan Kubicki led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth’s global temperatures. However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply isn’t possible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise. Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that Earth’s atmosphere is already “saturated” with carbon dioxide. This saturation means that, even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the “greenhouse gas” will not cause temperatures to rise. Nevertheless, unelected globalists at the United Nations Environment Program claim that livestock accounts for about 32% of “human-caused methane emissions.” “We will take a big step closer in becoming climate neutral in 2045,” Bruus said. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author questions the evidence that CO2 emissions drive climate change.

EN_CC_200022.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change

The author argues that CO2 has no effect on the rise of temperature and it is a myth. The author targets Danish government who has introduced law that will tax livestock farmers for emissions from cows.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Denmark to Punish Farmers for Cow ‘Emissions’ to ‘Fight Global Warming’ by Frank Bergman, Slay News: The Danish government has introduced radical new laws that will tax livestock farmers for “emissions” from cows, pigs, and sheep to supposedly “fight global warming.” Demark has become the first country in the world to introduce a carbon tax that seeks to force farmers to comply with the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” agenda. The Scandinavian nation will tax farmers for the so-called “greenhouse gases” allegedly emitted by their livestock from 2030. Denmark’s globalist leaders claim they are targeting a major source of methane emissions, which they allege is one of the most potent gases contributing to “global warming.” In order to comply with the WEF’s “Net Zero” targets, Taxation Minister Jeppe Bruus said the aim is to reduce Danish “greenhouse gas emissions” by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030. As of 2030, Danish livestock farmers will be taxed $43 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2030. The tax will increase to $108 by 2035. However, because of an income tax deduction of 60%, the actual cost per ton will start at $17.3 and increase to $28 by 2035. Although carbon dioxide is typically blamed for causing “climate change,” globalists claim that methane traps about 87 times more heat on a 20-year timescale. However, as Slay News has previously reported, top scientists have debunked these claims as a hoax. A recent peer-reviewed study provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Earth’s atmosphere cannot cause “global warming.” Dr. Jan Kubicki led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth’s global temperatures. However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply isn’t possible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise. Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that Earth’s atmosphere is already “saturated” with carbon dioxide. This saturation means that, even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the “greenhouse gas” will not cause temperatures to rise. Nevertheless, unelected globalists at the United Nations Environment Program claim that livestock accounts for about 32% of “human-caused methane emissions.” “We will take a big step closer in becoming climate neutral in 2045,” Bruus said. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text suggests that the CO2 does not drive climate change, since it would have no effect if the atmosphere is saturated

EN_CC_200022.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change

The author argues that CO2 has no effect on the rise of temperature and it is a myth. The author targets Danish government who has introduced law that will tax livestock farmers for emissions from cows.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Denmark to Punish Farmers for Cow ‘Emissions’ to ‘Fight Global Warming’ by Frank Bergman, Slay News: The Danish government has introduced radical new laws that will tax livestock farmers for “emissions” from cows, pigs, and sheep to supposedly “fight global warming.” Demark has become the first country in the world to introduce a carbon tax that seeks to force farmers to comply with the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” agenda. The Scandinavian nation will tax farmers for the so-called “greenhouse gases” allegedly emitted by their livestock from 2030. Denmark’s globalist leaders claim they are targeting a major source of methane emissions, which they allege is one of the most potent gases contributing to “global warming.” In order to comply with the WEF’s “Net Zero” targets, Taxation Minister Jeppe Bruus said the aim is to reduce Danish “greenhouse gas emissions” by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030. As of 2030, Danish livestock farmers will be taxed $43 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2030. The tax will increase to $108 by 2035. However, because of an income tax deduction of 60%, the actual cost per ton will start at $17.3 and increase to $28 by 2035. Although carbon dioxide is typically blamed for causing “climate change,” globalists claim that methane traps about 87 times more heat on a 20-year timescale. However, as Slay News has previously reported, top scientists have debunked these claims as a hoax. A recent peer-reviewed study provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Earth’s atmosphere cannot cause “global warming.” Dr. Jan Kubicki led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth’s global temperatures. However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply isn’t possible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise. Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that Earth’s atmosphere is already “saturated” with carbon dioxide. This saturation means that, even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the “greenhouse gas” will not cause temperatures to rise. Nevertheless, unelected globalists at the United Nations Environment Program claim that livestock accounts for about 32% of “human-caused methane emissions.” “We will take a big step closer in becoming climate neutral in 2045,” Bruus said. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text has several passages stating that CO2 cannot cause warming. and that the climate movement is based on false science

EN_CC_200022.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change

The author argues that CO2 has no effect on the rise of temperature and it is a myth. The author targets Danish government who has introduced law that will tax livestock farmers for emissions from cows.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Denmark to Punish Farmers for Cow ‘Emissions’ to ‘Fight Global Warming’ by Frank Bergman, Slay News: The Danish government has introduced radical new laws that will tax livestock farmers for “emissions” from cows, pigs, and sheep to supposedly “fight global warming.” Demark has become the first country in the world to introduce a carbon tax that seeks to force farmers to comply with the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” agenda. The Scandinavian nation will tax farmers for the so-called “greenhouse gases” allegedly emitted by their livestock from 2030. Denmark’s globalist leaders claim they are targeting a major source of methane emissions, which they allege is one of the most potent gases contributing to “global warming.” In order to comply with the WEF’s “Net Zero” targets, Taxation Minister Jeppe Bruus said the aim is to reduce Danish “greenhouse gas emissions” by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030. As of 2030, Danish livestock farmers will be taxed $43 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2030. The tax will increase to $108 by 2035. However, because of an income tax deduction of 60%, the actual cost per ton will start at $17.3 and increase to $28 by 2035. Although carbon dioxide is typically blamed for causing “climate change,” globalists claim that methane traps about 87 times more heat on a 20-year timescale. However, as Slay News has previously reported, top scientists have debunked these claims as a hoax. A recent peer-reviewed study provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Earth’s atmosphere cannot cause “global warming.” Dr. Jan Kubicki led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth’s global temperatures. However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply isn’t possible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise. Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that Earth’s atmosphere is already “saturated” with carbon dioxide. This saturation means that, even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the “greenhouse gas” will not cause temperatures to rise. Nevertheless, unelected globalists at the United Nations Environment Program claim that livestock accounts for about 32% of “human-caused methane emissions.” “We will take a big step closer in becoming climate neutral in 2045,” Bruus said. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text attacks climate movement for adopting scientific evidence that was refuted by scientific community. It also attack climate movement for targeting certain groups and sectors of society to reach emission goals

EN_CC_200022.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change

The author argues that CO2 has no effect on the rise of temperature and it is a myth. The author targets Danish government who has introduced law that will tax livestock farmers for emissions from cows.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin says what Russia needs to do to win special operation in Ukraine Russia will win the special operation in Ukraine if the society shows consolidation and composure to the enemy, President Vladimir Putin said during a visit to the Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant on March 14, Rossiya 24 TV channel said. Russia is not improving its geopolitical position in Ukraine. Instead, Russia is fighting "for the survival of Russian statehood, for the future development of the country and our children." "In order to bring peace and stability closer, we, of course, need to show the consolidation and composure of our society. When the enemy sees that our society is strong, internally braced up, consolidated, then, without any doubt we will come to reach what we are striving for — both success and victory," Putin said. According to him, many of the current problems began after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when they tried to put pressure on Russia to "destabilise the internal political situation.” "Hordes of international terrorists" new sent to the purpose to accomplish this goal, Putin said. Afterwards, the West decided to start rehabilitating Nazism in Russia's neighbouring states, including in Ukraine. Nevertheless, Putin continued, Russia had long tried to build partnerships with both Western countries and Ukraine. However, after 2014, when the West contributed to the coup in Ukraine, the state of affairs changed dramatically. It was then when they started exterminating those who advocated the development of normal relations with Russia, he said. According to Putin, Russia was forced to launch the special operation to protect the population. Western countries were hoping to break Russia quickly, but they were wrong, he said adding that Russia managed to raise its economic sovereignty since 2022. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article presenting several passages in which Russia's decision to invade Ukraine is justified by the fact that Western countries pose a threat to Russia, trying to undermine its security. The argument relies on several historical events which Western countries supported Nazi regime in the former Soviet Republics, contributed to the coup in Ukraine in 2014 and is still promoting Nazism and terrorism

EN_UA_013257.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

The text presents several passages that together convey a narrative in which Russia's decision to invade Ukraine is justified by the the fact that the West attempted to undermine security of Russia, fostering terrorism, economic instability, nazism, and organizing a coup in Ukraine in 2014.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin says what Russia needs to do to win special operation in Ukraine Russia will win the special operation in Ukraine if the society shows consolidation and composure to the enemy, President Vladimir Putin said during a visit to the Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant on March 14, Rossiya 24 TV channel said. Russia is not improving its geopolitical position in Ukraine. Instead, Russia is fighting "for the survival of Russian statehood, for the future development of the country and our children." "In order to bring peace and stability closer, we, of course, need to show the consolidation and composure of our society. When the enemy sees that our society is strong, internally braced up, consolidated, then, without any doubt we will come to reach what we are striving for — both success and victory," Putin said. According to him, many of the current problems began after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when they tried to put pressure on Russia to "destabilise the internal political situation.” "Hordes of international terrorists" new sent to the purpose to accomplish this goal, Putin said. Afterwards, the West decided to start rehabilitating Nazism in Russia's neighbouring states, including in Ukraine. Nevertheless, Putin continued, Russia had long tried to build partnerships with both Western countries and Ukraine. However, after 2014, when the West contributed to the coup in Ukraine, the state of affairs changed dramatically. It was then when they started exterminating those who advocated the development of normal relations with Russia, he said. According to Putin, Russia was forced to launch the special operation to protect the population. Western countries were hoping to break Russia quickly, but they were wrong, he said adding that Russia managed to raise its economic sovereignty since 2022. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text presents several paragraphs in which the West is blamed for instigating war in Ukraine, rather than Russia. The text also mentions the historical background of the tensions in the region

EN_UA_013257.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

The text presents several passages that together convey a narrative in which Russia's decision to invade Ukraine is justified by the the fact that the West attempted to undermine security of Russia, fostering terrorism, economic instability, nazism, and organizing a coup in Ukraine in 2014.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin says what Russia needs to do to win special operation in Ukraine Russia will win the special operation in Ukraine if the society shows consolidation and composure to the enemy, President Vladimir Putin said during a visit to the Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant on March 14, Rossiya 24 TV channel said. Russia is not improving its geopolitical position in Ukraine. Instead, Russia is fighting "for the survival of Russian statehood, for the future development of the country and our children." "In order to bring peace and stability closer, we, of course, need to show the consolidation and composure of our society. When the enemy sees that our society is strong, internally braced up, consolidated, then, without any doubt we will come to reach what we are striving for — both success and victory," Putin said. According to him, many of the current problems began after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when they tried to put pressure on Russia to "destabilise the internal political situation.” "Hordes of international terrorists" new sent to the purpose to accomplish this goal, Putin said. Afterwards, the West decided to start rehabilitating Nazism in Russia's neighbouring states, including in Ukraine. Nevertheless, Putin continued, Russia had long tried to build partnerships with both Western countries and Ukraine. However, after 2014, when the West contributed to the coup in Ukraine, the state of affairs changed dramatically. It was then when they started exterminating those who advocated the development of normal relations with Russia, he said. According to Putin, Russia was forced to launch the special operation to protect the population. Western countries were hoping to break Russia quickly, but they were wrong, he said adding that Russia managed to raise its economic sovereignty since 2022. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs depict Western countries as the aggressors of Russia. These countries are accused of being behind the problems of the collapse of the Soviet Union and fostering Nazism in Ukraine.

EN_UA_013257.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

The text presents several passages that together convey a narrative in which Russia's decision to invade Ukraine is justified by the the fact that the West attempted to undermine security of Russia, fostering terrorism, economic instability, nazism, and organizing a coup in Ukraine in 2014.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin says what Russia needs to do to win special operation in Ukraine Russia will win the special operation in Ukraine if the society shows consolidation and composure to the enemy, President Vladimir Putin said during a visit to the Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant on March 14, Rossiya 24 TV channel said. Russia is not improving its geopolitical position in Ukraine. Instead, Russia is fighting "for the survival of Russian statehood, for the future development of the country and our children." "In order to bring peace and stability closer, we, of course, need to show the consolidation and composure of our society. When the enemy sees that our society is strong, internally braced up, consolidated, then, without any doubt we will come to reach what we are striving for — both success and victory," Putin said. According to him, many of the current problems began after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when they tried to put pressure on Russia to "destabilise the internal political situation.” "Hordes of international terrorists" new sent to the purpose to accomplish this goal, Putin said. Afterwards, the West decided to start rehabilitating Nazism in Russia's neighbouring states, including in Ukraine. Nevertheless, Putin continued, Russia had long tried to build partnerships with both Western countries and Ukraine. However, after 2014, when the West contributed to the coup in Ukraine, the state of affairs changed dramatically. It was then when they started exterminating those who advocated the development of normal relations with Russia, he said. According to Putin, Russia was forced to launch the special operation to protect the population. Western countries were hoping to break Russia quickly, but they were wrong, he said adding that Russia managed to raise its economic sovereignty since 2022. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text present several paragraphs suggesting that the war in Ukraine is due to Western countries' interference in Ukraine, aiming at destabilising the situation in Russia. The text underlines the resilience of the Russian population that is supporting the war effort

EN_UA_013257.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

The text presents several passages that together convey a narrative in which Russia's decision to invade Ukraine is justified by the the fact that the West attempted to undermine security of Russia, fostering terrorism, economic instability, nazism, and organizing a coup in Ukraine in 2014.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin says what Russia needs to do to win special operation in Ukraine Russia will win the special operation in Ukraine if the society shows consolidation and composure to the enemy, President Vladimir Putin said during a visit to the Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant on March 14, Rossiya 24 TV channel said. Russia is not improving its geopolitical position in Ukraine. Instead, Russia is fighting "for the survival of Russian statehood, for the future development of the country and our children." "In order to bring peace and stability closer, we, of course, need to show the consolidation and composure of our society. When the enemy sees that our society is strong, internally braced up, consolidated, then, without any doubt we will come to reach what we are striving for — both success and victory," Putin said. According to him, many of the current problems began after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when they tried to put pressure on Russia to "destabilise the internal political situation.” "Hordes of international terrorists" new sent to the purpose to accomplish this goal, Putin said. Afterwards, the West decided to start rehabilitating Nazism in Russia's neighbouring states, including in Ukraine. Nevertheless, Putin continued, Russia had long tried to build partnerships with both Western countries and Ukraine. However, after 2014, when the West contributed to the coup in Ukraine, the state of affairs changed dramatically. It was then when they started exterminating those who advocated the development of normal relations with Russia, he said. According to Putin, Russia was forced to launch the special operation to protect the population. Western countries were hoping to break Russia quickly, but they were wrong, he said adding that Russia managed to raise its economic sovereignty since 2022. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several passages suggest that Russia is not the agressor and is rather the victim of attacks launched by the West. According to the text, Russia had no choice but to launch the SMO in order to protect its population.

EN_UA_013257.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

The text presents several passages that together convey a narrative in which Russia's decision to invade Ukraine is justified by the the fact that the West attempted to undermine security of Russia, fostering terrorism, economic instability, nazism, and organizing a coup in Ukraine in 2014.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Watch incredible first-person video as Russian pilot EJECTS and haplessly watches his plane crash after being shot down INCREDIBLE footage shows a panicked Russian pilot ejecting from his plane and watching as it crashes in a fireball after being shot down. The explosion could be seen miles away after the jet was taken down by what is thought to be Ukrainian fire. The fighter pilot had to release his parachute mid-air and was forced to land in an abandoned field. The shocking first-person footage is believed to have been recorded in the summer but wasn't released until now. It shows the Russian fighter pilot release his parachute mid-air after his Su-25SM was taken down by what's believed to have been incoming Ukrainian fire, according to a weapons tracking account on Twitter. The aircraft nose-dives into the ground, unleashing a hellish explosion that can be seen from miles away while the pilot lands safety in an abandoned field. READ MORE ON WORLD NEWS It is unclear what happened to the pilot since the recording but some observers claim the flight crashed during a planned training run in Belgorod region, Russia. It comes as astonishing footage shows the moment a Ukrainian tank opened fire in a vicious battle against Russian forces. Fierce fighting can be seen in the video as the 46-tonne T-84 main battle tank blasts its 125mm cannon towards Putin's men during the bloody clash that is understood to have occurred near Kherson. Ukrainian forces are seen engaging nearly point-blank with a Russian convoy who appear to have blundered into them as they drove up a dirt road. Most read in The Sun Trucks emblazoned with the "Z" symbol can see attempting to rush past the tank - only for soldiers on the ground to then open fire on them. The bearded gunner in the tank's turret ducks down as gunfire can be heard all around him. With the snaps of bullets and the boom of tank guns, the convoy - with a truck towing a howitzer and an armoured personnel carrier - grind to a halt. Other clips released as part of the video package shows the gunner opening fire on unseen foes with his heavy machine gun. It's believed Mad Vlad would happily sacrifice 20 million soldiers to ensure he won the war in Ukraine and secure his future as Russia's leader, a former insider has claimed. The chilling warning comes as fears of the war in Ukraine turning nuclear continue to grow as Russia's defence minister said a "dirty bomb" could be detonated in Ukraine. Exiled former diplomat Boris Bondarev warned Putin would sacrifice millions of lives to win in Ukraine. "He is not smart, he is just lucky. Now I think his luck is over," Mr Bondarev told Sky News. "You should have no doubt about it, he may sacrifice 10 or 20 million Russians just to win this war just to slaughter all Ukrainians because it's a matter of principle. "It's a matter of political survival to him. You have to understand that, if he loses the war, it will be the end for him." Bondarev added: "After losing the war, he will have to explain to his elites and his population why it is so and he may find some problems in explaining this. "And after that there may be opposition who will try to depose him or he will try to purge his subordinates to find some people who could be blamed for all these problems." Meanwhile, Russian war boss Sergei Shoigu warned that the brutal warzone is risking "uncontrolled escalation" as Putin's forces continue to be pushed back across the frontline. Shoigu suggested that Ukraine could actually be the one to detonate a "dirty bomb" - an explosive laced with radioactive material. And while not a true nuclear weapon, the consequences of using such a device could be catastrophic. But it has been Russia wildly swinging the nuclear sabre during the war - and the latest allegation could be another diversion tactic. Putin's forces like to spread as much chaos and misinformation as possible to cover their own tracks. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun And so Shoigu's warning sparks fears over what the Russians may be planning as they are beaten back across the frontline. As expected, Russia presented no evidence for their claims. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article amplifying fears of use of unconventional weapons in the context of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The author suggests that Russia may even be behind the use of such weapons, underlingining how chaotic and unpredictable the situation is

EN_UA_102958.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

In some paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative emphasizing the dangers related to the war in Ukraine, especially the potential use of unconventional weapons, the huge casualties, and the nuclear option

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Watch incredible first-person video as Russian pilot EJECTS and haplessly watches his plane crash after being shot down INCREDIBLE footage shows a panicked Russian pilot ejecting from his plane and watching as it crashes in a fireball after being shot down. The explosion could be seen miles away after the jet was taken down by what is thought to be Ukrainian fire. The fighter pilot had to release his parachute mid-air and was forced to land in an abandoned field. The shocking first-person footage is believed to have been recorded in the summer but wasn't released until now. It shows the Russian fighter pilot release his parachute mid-air after his Su-25SM was taken down by what's believed to have been incoming Ukrainian fire, according to a weapons tracking account on Twitter. The aircraft nose-dives into the ground, unleashing a hellish explosion that can be seen from miles away while the pilot lands safety in an abandoned field. READ MORE ON WORLD NEWS It is unclear what happened to the pilot since the recording but some observers claim the flight crashed during a planned training run in Belgorod region, Russia. It comes as astonishing footage shows the moment a Ukrainian tank opened fire in a vicious battle against Russian forces. Fierce fighting can be seen in the video as the 46-tonne T-84 main battle tank blasts its 125mm cannon towards Putin's men during the bloody clash that is understood to have occurred near Kherson. Ukrainian forces are seen engaging nearly point-blank with a Russian convoy who appear to have blundered into them as they drove up a dirt road. Most read in The Sun Trucks emblazoned with the "Z" symbol can see attempting to rush past the tank - only for soldiers on the ground to then open fire on them. The bearded gunner in the tank's turret ducks down as gunfire can be heard all around him. With the snaps of bullets and the boom of tank guns, the convoy - with a truck towing a howitzer and an armoured personnel carrier - grind to a halt. Other clips released as part of the video package shows the gunner opening fire on unseen foes with his heavy machine gun. It's believed Mad Vlad would happily sacrifice 20 million soldiers to ensure he won the war in Ukraine and secure his future as Russia's leader, a former insider has claimed. The chilling warning comes as fears of the war in Ukraine turning nuclear continue to grow as Russia's defence minister said a "dirty bomb" could be detonated in Ukraine. Exiled former diplomat Boris Bondarev warned Putin would sacrifice millions of lives to win in Ukraine. "He is not smart, he is just lucky. Now I think his luck is over," Mr Bondarev told Sky News. "You should have no doubt about it, he may sacrifice 10 or 20 million Russians just to win this war just to slaughter all Ukrainians because it's a matter of principle. "It's a matter of political survival to him. You have to understand that, if he loses the war, it will be the end for him." Bondarev added: "After losing the war, he will have to explain to his elites and his population why it is so and he may find some problems in explaining this. "And after that there may be opposition who will try to depose him or he will try to purge his subordinates to find some people who could be blamed for all these problems." Meanwhile, Russian war boss Sergei Shoigu warned that the brutal warzone is risking "uncontrolled escalation" as Putin's forces continue to be pushed back across the frontline. Shoigu suggested that Ukraine could actually be the one to detonate a "dirty bomb" - an explosive laced with radioactive material. And while not a true nuclear weapon, the consequences of using such a device could be catastrophic. But it has been Russia wildly swinging the nuclear sabre during the war - and the latest allegation could be another diversion tactic. Putin's forces like to spread as much chaos and misinformation as possible to cover their own tracks. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun And so Shoigu's warning sparks fears over what the Russians may be planning as they are beaten back across the frontline. As expected, Russia presented no evidence for their claims. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs report alleged actions by Russian army in Ukraine. Several passages mention the possible use of nuclear weapons.

EN_UA_102958.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

In some paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative emphasizing the dangers related to the war in Ukraine, especially the potential use of unconventional weapons, the huge casualties, and the nuclear option

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Watch incredible first-person video as Russian pilot EJECTS and haplessly watches his plane crash after being shot down INCREDIBLE footage shows a panicked Russian pilot ejecting from his plane and watching as it crashes in a fireball after being shot down. The explosion could be seen miles away after the jet was taken down by what is thought to be Ukrainian fire. The fighter pilot had to release his parachute mid-air and was forced to land in an abandoned field. The shocking first-person footage is believed to have been recorded in the summer but wasn't released until now. It shows the Russian fighter pilot release his parachute mid-air after his Su-25SM was taken down by what's believed to have been incoming Ukrainian fire, according to a weapons tracking account on Twitter. The aircraft nose-dives into the ground, unleashing a hellish explosion that can be seen from miles away while the pilot lands safety in an abandoned field. READ MORE ON WORLD NEWS It is unclear what happened to the pilot since the recording but some observers claim the flight crashed during a planned training run in Belgorod region, Russia. It comes as astonishing footage shows the moment a Ukrainian tank opened fire in a vicious battle against Russian forces. Fierce fighting can be seen in the video as the 46-tonne T-84 main battle tank blasts its 125mm cannon towards Putin's men during the bloody clash that is understood to have occurred near Kherson. Ukrainian forces are seen engaging nearly point-blank with a Russian convoy who appear to have blundered into them as they drove up a dirt road. Most read in The Sun Trucks emblazoned with the "Z" symbol can see attempting to rush past the tank - only for soldiers on the ground to then open fire on them. The bearded gunner in the tank's turret ducks down as gunfire can be heard all around him. With the snaps of bullets and the boom of tank guns, the convoy - with a truck towing a howitzer and an armoured personnel carrier - grind to a halt. Other clips released as part of the video package shows the gunner opening fire on unseen foes with his heavy machine gun. It's believed Mad Vlad would happily sacrifice 20 million soldiers to ensure he won the war in Ukraine and secure his future as Russia's leader, a former insider has claimed. The chilling warning comes as fears of the war in Ukraine turning nuclear continue to grow as Russia's defence minister said a "dirty bomb" could be detonated in Ukraine. Exiled former diplomat Boris Bondarev warned Putin would sacrifice millions of lives to win in Ukraine. "He is not smart, he is just lucky. Now I think his luck is over," Mr Bondarev told Sky News. "You should have no doubt about it, he may sacrifice 10 or 20 million Russians just to win this war just to slaughter all Ukrainians because it's a matter of principle. "It's a matter of political survival to him. You have to understand that, if he loses the war, it will be the end for him." Bondarev added: "After losing the war, he will have to explain to his elites and his population why it is so and he may find some problems in explaining this. "And after that there may be opposition who will try to depose him or he will try to purge his subordinates to find some people who could be blamed for all these problems." Meanwhile, Russian war boss Sergei Shoigu warned that the brutal warzone is risking "uncontrolled escalation" as Putin's forces continue to be pushed back across the frontline. Shoigu suggested that Ukraine could actually be the one to detonate a "dirty bomb" - an explosive laced with radioactive material. And while not a true nuclear weapon, the consequences of using such a device could be catastrophic. But it has been Russia wildly swinging the nuclear sabre during the war - and the latest allegation could be another diversion tactic. Putin's forces like to spread as much chaos and misinformation as possible to cover their own tracks. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun And so Shoigu's warning sparks fears over what the Russians may be planning as they are beaten back across the frontline. As expected, Russia presented no evidence for their claims. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article claims that Putin's army has no regard for human lives and that is willing to sacrifice many of them to win in Ukraine. Article also mentions nuclear weapons in relation to the war in Ukraine.

EN_UA_102958.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

In some paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative emphasizing the dangers related to the war in Ukraine, especially the potential use of unconventional weapons, the huge casualties, and the nuclear option

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Watch incredible first-person video as Russian pilot EJECTS and haplessly watches his plane crash after being shot down INCREDIBLE footage shows a panicked Russian pilot ejecting from his plane and watching as it crashes in a fireball after being shot down. The explosion could be seen miles away after the jet was taken down by what is thought to be Ukrainian fire. The fighter pilot had to release his parachute mid-air and was forced to land in an abandoned field. The shocking first-person footage is believed to have been recorded in the summer but wasn't released until now. It shows the Russian fighter pilot release his parachute mid-air after his Su-25SM was taken down by what's believed to have been incoming Ukrainian fire, according to a weapons tracking account on Twitter. The aircraft nose-dives into the ground, unleashing a hellish explosion that can be seen from miles away while the pilot lands safety in an abandoned field. READ MORE ON WORLD NEWS It is unclear what happened to the pilot since the recording but some observers claim the flight crashed during a planned training run in Belgorod region, Russia. It comes as astonishing footage shows the moment a Ukrainian tank opened fire in a vicious battle against Russian forces. Fierce fighting can be seen in the video as the 46-tonne T-84 main battle tank blasts its 125mm cannon towards Putin's men during the bloody clash that is understood to have occurred near Kherson. Ukrainian forces are seen engaging nearly point-blank with a Russian convoy who appear to have blundered into them as they drove up a dirt road. Most read in The Sun Trucks emblazoned with the "Z" symbol can see attempting to rush past the tank - only for soldiers on the ground to then open fire on them. The bearded gunner in the tank's turret ducks down as gunfire can be heard all around him. With the snaps of bullets and the boom of tank guns, the convoy - with a truck towing a howitzer and an armoured personnel carrier - grind to a halt. Other clips released as part of the video package shows the gunner opening fire on unseen foes with his heavy machine gun. It's believed Mad Vlad would happily sacrifice 20 million soldiers to ensure he won the war in Ukraine and secure his future as Russia's leader, a former insider has claimed. The chilling warning comes as fears of the war in Ukraine turning nuclear continue to grow as Russia's defence minister said a "dirty bomb" could be detonated in Ukraine. Exiled former diplomat Boris Bondarev warned Putin would sacrifice millions of lives to win in Ukraine. "He is not smart, he is just lucky. Now I think his luck is over," Mr Bondarev told Sky News. "You should have no doubt about it, he may sacrifice 10 or 20 million Russians just to win this war just to slaughter all Ukrainians because it's a matter of principle. "It's a matter of political survival to him. You have to understand that, if he loses the war, it will be the end for him." Bondarev added: "After losing the war, he will have to explain to his elites and his population why it is so and he may find some problems in explaining this. "And after that there may be opposition who will try to depose him or he will try to purge his subordinates to find some people who could be blamed for all these problems." Meanwhile, Russian war boss Sergei Shoigu warned that the brutal warzone is risking "uncontrolled escalation" as Putin's forces continue to be pushed back across the frontline. Shoigu suggested that Ukraine could actually be the one to detonate a "dirty bomb" - an explosive laced with radioactive material. And while not a true nuclear weapon, the consequences of using such a device could be catastrophic. But it has been Russia wildly swinging the nuclear sabre during the war - and the latest allegation could be another diversion tactic. Putin's forces like to spread as much chaos and misinformation as possible to cover their own tracks. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun And so Shoigu's warning sparks fears over what the Russians may be planning as they are beaten back across the frontline. As expected, Russia presented no evidence for their claims. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout the whole text, there are passages stressing the potential escalation of the situation in Ukraine, specifically the use of atomic weapons, and the fact that Ukraine is risking to fall into the Russian hands.

EN_UA_102958.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

In some paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative emphasizing the dangers related to the war in Ukraine, especially the potential use of unconventional weapons, the huge casualties, and the nuclear option

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Watch incredible first-person video as Russian pilot EJECTS and haplessly watches his plane crash after being shot down INCREDIBLE footage shows a panicked Russian pilot ejecting from his plane and watching as it crashes in a fireball after being shot down. The explosion could be seen miles away after the jet was taken down by what is thought to be Ukrainian fire. The fighter pilot had to release his parachute mid-air and was forced to land in an abandoned field. The shocking first-person footage is believed to have been recorded in the summer but wasn't released until now. It shows the Russian fighter pilot release his parachute mid-air after his Su-25SM was taken down by what's believed to have been incoming Ukrainian fire, according to a weapons tracking account on Twitter. The aircraft nose-dives into the ground, unleashing a hellish explosion that can be seen from miles away while the pilot lands safety in an abandoned field. READ MORE ON WORLD NEWS It is unclear what happened to the pilot since the recording but some observers claim the flight crashed during a planned training run in Belgorod region, Russia. It comes as astonishing footage shows the moment a Ukrainian tank opened fire in a vicious battle against Russian forces. Fierce fighting can be seen in the video as the 46-tonne T-84 main battle tank blasts its 125mm cannon towards Putin's men during the bloody clash that is understood to have occurred near Kherson. Ukrainian forces are seen engaging nearly point-blank with a Russian convoy who appear to have blundered into them as they drove up a dirt road. Most read in The Sun Trucks emblazoned with the "Z" symbol can see attempting to rush past the tank - only for soldiers on the ground to then open fire on them. The bearded gunner in the tank's turret ducks down as gunfire can be heard all around him. With the snaps of bullets and the boom of tank guns, the convoy - with a truck towing a howitzer and an armoured personnel carrier - grind to a halt. Other clips released as part of the video package shows the gunner opening fire on unseen foes with his heavy machine gun. It's believed Mad Vlad would happily sacrifice 20 million soldiers to ensure he won the war in Ukraine and secure his future as Russia's leader, a former insider has claimed. The chilling warning comes as fears of the war in Ukraine turning nuclear continue to grow as Russia's defence minister said a "dirty bomb" could be detonated in Ukraine. Exiled former diplomat Boris Bondarev warned Putin would sacrifice millions of lives to win in Ukraine. "He is not smart, he is just lucky. Now I think his luck is over," Mr Bondarev told Sky News. "You should have no doubt about it, he may sacrifice 10 or 20 million Russians just to win this war just to slaughter all Ukrainians because it's a matter of principle. "It's a matter of political survival to him. You have to understand that, if he loses the war, it will be the end for him." Bondarev added: "After losing the war, he will have to explain to his elites and his population why it is so and he may find some problems in explaining this. "And after that there may be opposition who will try to depose him or he will try to purge his subordinates to find some people who could be blamed for all these problems." Meanwhile, Russian war boss Sergei Shoigu warned that the brutal warzone is risking "uncontrolled escalation" as Putin's forces continue to be pushed back across the frontline. Shoigu suggested that Ukraine could actually be the one to detonate a "dirty bomb" - an explosive laced with radioactive material. And while not a true nuclear weapon, the consequences of using such a device could be catastrophic. But it has been Russia wildly swinging the nuclear sabre during the war - and the latest allegation could be another diversion tactic. Putin's forces like to spread as much chaos and misinformation as possible to cover their own tracks. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun And so Shoigu's warning sparks fears over what the Russians may be planning as they are beaten back across the frontline. As expected, Russia presented no evidence for their claims. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs emphasise the use of nuclear weapons by Russian forces and the likely outcomes of such use

EN_UA_102958.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

In some paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative emphasizing the dangers related to the war in Ukraine, especially the potential use of unconventional weapons, the huge casualties, and the nuclear option

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Says US Is Responsible for Deadly Ukrainian Attack on Crimea MOSCOW—Russia said on Sunday that the United States was responsible for a Ukrainian attack on Crimean peninsula with five U.S.–supplied missiles that killed four people, including two children, and injured 151 more. The Russian Defence Ministry said four of the U.S.–delivered Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles, equipped with cluster warheads, were shot down by air defense systems and the ammunition of a fifth had detonated in mid-air. Footage on Russian state television showed people running from a beach and some people being carried off on sun loungers. Russian authorities in Crimea said missile fragments had fallen just after noon near a beach on the north side of the city of Sevastopol where locals were on holiday. The incident generated a furious reaction among Russian public figures. The Defense Ministry said U.S. specialists had set the missiles’ flight coordinates on the basis of information from U.S. spy satellites, meaning Washington was directly responsible. “Responsibility for the deliberate missile attack on the civilians of Sevastopol is borne above all by Washington, which supplied these weapons to Ukraine, and by the Kyiv regime, from whose territory this strike was carried out,” the ministry said. Russia sent its troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The United States began supplying Ukraine with longer range ATACMS missiles, which have a 300-kilometre (186-mile) range, earlier this year. Treating the InjuredSevastopol Governor Mihail Razvozhaev put the death toll at four, with 144 injured, including 82 taken to hospitals. Twenty-seven children were among the injured. Specialist doctors were being flown in from other parts of Russia. Russia will respond to Sunday’s attack, the Defense Ministry said, without elaborating. The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin had been “in constant contact with the military” since the attack. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, described the incident as “a vile, despicable act against our people.” He likened it to attacks carried out by gunmen on Sunday against a synagogue, a church, and police post in Dagestan and said there was “no difference to us” between the U.S. administration, Ukrainian leaders, and “crazy fanatics.” Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill said there “was no justification whatsoever for a missile strike on civilians” and expressed indignation that the incident occurred on the Orthodox holiday of Trinity. Neither Ukraine nor the United States has commented on the attack, which came on a day when Ukraine said one person had been killed and 10 others wounded by Russian strikes on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs suggest that the US and the West are the aggressors, responsible for attacks on Russian territory.

EN_UA_027787.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Throughout several paragraphs, the text suggests that the US is responsible for military attacks on Russian territories, arguing that the US are directly involved in the conflict.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Says US Is Responsible for Deadly Ukrainian Attack on Crimea MOSCOW—Russia said on Sunday that the United States was responsible for a Ukrainian attack on Crimean peninsula with five U.S.–supplied missiles that killed four people, including two children, and injured 151 more. The Russian Defence Ministry said four of the U.S.–delivered Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles, equipped with cluster warheads, were shot down by air defense systems and the ammunition of a fifth had detonated in mid-air. Footage on Russian state television showed people running from a beach and some people being carried off on sun loungers. Russian authorities in Crimea said missile fragments had fallen just after noon near a beach on the north side of the city of Sevastopol where locals were on holiday. The incident generated a furious reaction among Russian public figures. The Defense Ministry said U.S. specialists had set the missiles’ flight coordinates on the basis of information from U.S. spy satellites, meaning Washington was directly responsible. “Responsibility for the deliberate missile attack on the civilians of Sevastopol is borne above all by Washington, which supplied these weapons to Ukraine, and by the Kyiv regime, from whose territory this strike was carried out,” the ministry said. Russia sent its troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The United States began supplying Ukraine with longer range ATACMS missiles, which have a 300-kilometre (186-mile) range, earlier this year. Treating the InjuredSevastopol Governor Mihail Razvozhaev put the death toll at four, with 144 injured, including 82 taken to hospitals. Twenty-seven children were among the injured. Specialist doctors were being flown in from other parts of Russia. Russia will respond to Sunday’s attack, the Defense Ministry said, without elaborating. The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin had been “in constant contact with the military” since the attack. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, described the incident as “a vile, despicable act against our people.” He likened it to attacks carried out by gunmen on Sunday against a synagogue, a church, and police post in Dagestan and said there was “no difference to us” between the U.S. administration, Ukrainian leaders, and “crazy fanatics.” Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill said there “was no justification whatsoever for a missile strike on civilians” and expressed indignation that the incident occurred on the Orthodox holiday of Trinity. Neither Ukraine nor the United States has commented on the attack, which came on a day when Ukraine said one person had been killed and 10 others wounded by Russian strikes on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout the article, Russia accuses the US and Ukraine of attacking civilians, providing justification for Russian invasion of Ukraine.

EN_UA_027787.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Throughout several paragraphs, the text suggests that the US is responsible for military attacks on Russian territories, arguing that the US are directly involved in the conflict.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Says US Is Responsible for Deadly Ukrainian Attack on Crimea MOSCOW—Russia said on Sunday that the United States was responsible for a Ukrainian attack on Crimean peninsula with five U.S.–supplied missiles that killed four people, including two children, and injured 151 more. The Russian Defence Ministry said four of the U.S.–delivered Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles, equipped with cluster warheads, were shot down by air defense systems and the ammunition of a fifth had detonated in mid-air. Footage on Russian state television showed people running from a beach and some people being carried off on sun loungers. Russian authorities in Crimea said missile fragments had fallen just after noon near a beach on the north side of the city of Sevastopol where locals were on holiday. The incident generated a furious reaction among Russian public figures. The Defense Ministry said U.S. specialists had set the missiles’ flight coordinates on the basis of information from U.S. spy satellites, meaning Washington was directly responsible. “Responsibility for the deliberate missile attack on the civilians of Sevastopol is borne above all by Washington, which supplied these weapons to Ukraine, and by the Kyiv regime, from whose territory this strike was carried out,” the ministry said. Russia sent its troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The United States began supplying Ukraine with longer range ATACMS missiles, which have a 300-kilometre (186-mile) range, earlier this year. Treating the InjuredSevastopol Governor Mihail Razvozhaev put the death toll at four, with 144 injured, including 82 taken to hospitals. Twenty-seven children were among the injured. Specialist doctors were being flown in from other parts of Russia. Russia will respond to Sunday’s attack, the Defense Ministry said, without elaborating. The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin had been “in constant contact with the military” since the attack. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, described the incident as “a vile, despicable act against our people.” He likened it to attacks carried out by gunmen on Sunday against a synagogue, a church, and police post in Dagestan and said there was “no difference to us” between the U.S. administration, Ukrainian leaders, and “crazy fanatics.” Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill said there “was no justification whatsoever for a missile strike on civilians” and expressed indignation that the incident occurred on the Orthodox holiday of Trinity. Neither Ukraine nor the United States has commented on the attack, which came on a day when Ukraine said one person had been killed and 10 others wounded by Russian strikes on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs blame the US and Ukraine for attacks on Crimea, ultimately claiming the US is responsible for the war in Ukraine.

EN_UA_027787.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Throughout several paragraphs, the text suggests that the US is responsible for military attacks on Russian territories, arguing that the US are directly involved in the conflict.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Says US Is Responsible for Deadly Ukrainian Attack on Crimea MOSCOW—Russia said on Sunday that the United States was responsible for a Ukrainian attack on Crimean peninsula with five U.S.–supplied missiles that killed four people, including two children, and injured 151 more. The Russian Defence Ministry said four of the U.S.–delivered Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles, equipped with cluster warheads, were shot down by air defense systems and the ammunition of a fifth had detonated in mid-air. Footage on Russian state television showed people running from a beach and some people being carried off on sun loungers. Russian authorities in Crimea said missile fragments had fallen just after noon near a beach on the north side of the city of Sevastopol where locals were on holiday. The incident generated a furious reaction among Russian public figures. The Defense Ministry said U.S. specialists had set the missiles’ flight coordinates on the basis of information from U.S. spy satellites, meaning Washington was directly responsible. “Responsibility for the deliberate missile attack on the civilians of Sevastopol is borne above all by Washington, which supplied these weapons to Ukraine, and by the Kyiv regime, from whose territory this strike was carried out,” the ministry said. Russia sent its troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The United States began supplying Ukraine with longer range ATACMS missiles, which have a 300-kilometre (186-mile) range, earlier this year. Treating the InjuredSevastopol Governor Mihail Razvozhaev put the death toll at four, with 144 injured, including 82 taken to hospitals. Twenty-seven children were among the injured. Specialist doctors were being flown in from other parts of Russia. Russia will respond to Sunday’s attack, the Defense Ministry said, without elaborating. The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin had been “in constant contact with the military” since the attack. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, described the incident as “a vile, despicable act against our people.” He likened it to attacks carried out by gunmen on Sunday against a synagogue, a church, and police post in Dagestan and said there was “no difference to us” between the U.S. administration, Ukrainian leaders, and “crazy fanatics.” Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill said there “was no justification whatsoever for a missile strike on civilians” and expressed indignation that the incident occurred on the Orthodox holiday of Trinity. Neither Ukraine nor the United States has commented on the attack, which came on a day when Ukraine said one person had been killed and 10 others wounded by Russian strikes on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs throughout the text attribute responsibility for the attack on Sevastopool to the US, framing them as aggressors. They present evidence to support this, such as the use of US weapons and infrastructure. The text adopts a strongly emotional tone using words like "vile" and "despicable".

EN_UA_027787.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Throughout several paragraphs, the text suggests that the US is responsible for military attacks on Russian territories, arguing that the US are directly involved in the conflict.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Says US Is Responsible for Deadly Ukrainian Attack on Crimea MOSCOW—Russia said on Sunday that the United States was responsible for a Ukrainian attack on Crimean peninsula with five U.S.–supplied missiles that killed four people, including two children, and injured 151 more. The Russian Defence Ministry said four of the U.S.–delivered Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles, equipped with cluster warheads, were shot down by air defense systems and the ammunition of a fifth had detonated in mid-air. Footage on Russian state television showed people running from a beach and some people being carried off on sun loungers. Russian authorities in Crimea said missile fragments had fallen just after noon near a beach on the north side of the city of Sevastopol where locals were on holiday. The incident generated a furious reaction among Russian public figures. The Defense Ministry said U.S. specialists had set the missiles’ flight coordinates on the basis of information from U.S. spy satellites, meaning Washington was directly responsible. “Responsibility for the deliberate missile attack on the civilians of Sevastopol is borne above all by Washington, which supplied these weapons to Ukraine, and by the Kyiv regime, from whose territory this strike was carried out,” the ministry said. Russia sent its troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The United States began supplying Ukraine with longer range ATACMS missiles, which have a 300-kilometre (186-mile) range, earlier this year. Treating the InjuredSevastopol Governor Mihail Razvozhaev put the death toll at four, with 144 injured, including 82 taken to hospitals. Twenty-seven children were among the injured. Specialist doctors were being flown in from other parts of Russia. Russia will respond to Sunday’s attack, the Defense Ministry said, without elaborating. The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin had been “in constant contact with the military” since the attack. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, described the incident as “a vile, despicable act against our people.” He likened it to attacks carried out by gunmen on Sunday against a synagogue, a church, and police post in Dagestan and said there was “no difference to us” between the U.S. administration, Ukrainian leaders, and “crazy fanatics.” Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill said there “was no justification whatsoever for a missile strike on civilians” and expressed indignation that the incident occurred on the Orthodox holiday of Trinity. Neither Ukraine nor the United States has commented on the attack, which came on a day when Ukraine said one person had been killed and 10 others wounded by Russian strikes on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs depict the United States as responsible for the conflict by alleging that the country directly attacks Russia. This argument is based on the fact that the U.S. equips Ukraine with missiles and other military technologies

EN_UA_027787.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Throughout several paragraphs, the text suggests that the US is responsible for military attacks on Russian territories, arguing that the US are directly involved in the conflict.